• In regards to this, especially the note about the killing in self-defense, is that literally stated or is that your take on the matter? As we know Gyatso has killed and Aang didn't shy away from him.

      Loading editor
    • Well, Jinpa says: "You see, it's customary to maintain a level of separation between those who've taken a life, directly or indirectly, and those who have remained spiritually pure." Kyoshi reflects that Kelsang saved the lives of countless villagers by killing pirates, yet was treated as unclean.

      I believe that self-defense is also included due to the "directly or indirectly" line. Might be a stretch. Anyway, one should also not forget that about three hundred years passed between Kyoshi's early life and Gyatso's time. Philosophies change. In fact, the novel's chapter 1 mentions that the Air Nomads had become extremely detached from the world by Kyoshi's time. Jinpa was also treated as a oddity among his peers due to him managing the temple and its economy instead of focusing on enlightenment. By Aang's time, the Air Nomads actually appear to have taken greater interest in world affairs and non-spirtual matters.

        Loading editor
    • Indirectly killing someone could also be not helping someone in need when you know you can and your inactivity will result in their death (like in modern times not calling an ambulance for someone who's been beaten to near death). So I do think dragging self-defense into that may be too much of an assumption. Self-defense nearly always changes things.

        Loading editor
    • An anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.