Protection[]
Now, I understand that Kai unprotected the page, only for Flash to reprotect it. I think Kai is right in this case. Protecting articles that have not been vandalised could be understood as abuse of sysop powers. Consider this. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 08:32, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Seriously, what is wrong with you guys. THIS IS MY PROPERTY! No one but Zukofan and I will EDIT IT. Get it? This is fanon, it's mine, and no one's going to add to it. It's common sense, all of fanons do it so no one changes THEIR IDEAS. Sorry to get angry, but this is not abuse, it's precaution. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 16:03, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, I get it, it's YOUR PROPERTY! But that's still no reason to protect it because every good fanon user will now that you can only edit your own fanon and won't do it (unless it's a vandal). If it is a vandalised, then you can protect it.
- Kai Talk 22:37, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
I'm overly precautions, what can I say? Especially since an IP user created and vandalised a chapter of one of my stories. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 22:43, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- But this page hasn't been vandalised yet. General guidelines for protection on all wikis are that articles will only be protected because it has been vandalised. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 03:48, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Images to use[]
WARNING: SPOILERS!
<gallery> File:SazukiSmiles.jpg|Smiling File:SazukiYoung.jpg|As a child File:SakireFuneral.jpg|Sakire at his funeral </gallery>