Earth Kingdom box This is a page archive.

Please do not add or remove any content from it. (58,822 bytes)


Discuss proposed Speedy Deletions here. For Unspeedy Deletions go to: Avatar Wiki:Votes for Deletion

To add to the list add {{delete}} to the top of the page.

This is a talk page. Please remember to sign your posts using four tildes (~~~~).

Template:User character infobox

Why is this up for deletion? Zero 05:11, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

There is nothing in the rules against creating templates also I propose that this template could be used as a creature character infobox. So please don't delete. Lord Momo 05:28, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Lets see what the other admins say about it. And Tell Sanders to paste his reason here too. Zero 07:54, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

It is not hard to change the colors of a template as long as you know what you are looking for. I have done it myself and it is not hard and only takes a few minutes. So the page is pointless. Scott

i did that at first but why change the colors of another infobox when all i want is colors for my infobox so I made this page and now I provide a good use for it so its not your decision to make. Lord Momo 19:09, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

I really dont see the harm in what Momo's done. I mean what difference does it make if it stays. In fact it helps organise the User Pages. Think about this. Zero 06:03, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

There really isn't any harm in it staying. There isn't much need for it, but since the work was already done, there isn't any reason to delete it either. Howabout1-(Talk) 06:46, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Good. Then I'll just remove the delete tag and unprotect the page. Zero 07:03, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Actually, it might be possible to have the user infobox without there being a template page for it. The codes work the same way in all wikia pages, so if he wants to have a template, he just needs to copy the whole code into his page, that way he gets to keep his infobox, and other members can change the colors of the infobox in their own pages, the only annoying part is that you'll have a lot of coding in the beginning of you user or talk page. Anyone else agrees? Omnibender 17:18, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Its just one page. Zero - Talk 06:41, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Removal of Templates Page from Deletion List

I managed to remove the Templates Page from the Deletion List. Zero - Talk 08:02, 18 August 2008 (UTC)


Umm. Guys? The list is building here.

Senlin village leader is in two episodes. Plus, if you want to delete Ticket Lady (which is unnessary to do), then you must also delete Passport Attendant, which is equally as small. But please, don't delete them. Energybender - Talk 22:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

I worked hard on Passport attendant and Ticket Lady, and I don't believe they should be deleted. Why should any in the first place? Energybender - Talk 22:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Little Boy

I'm trying to fix up this article. Why is this a candidate for speedy deletion when other articles have the same or less information? Vaznock 22:50, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

i agree don't delete this article. he is a character in avatar so he deserves a page User:Luvingazula 20:44, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

ive made more edits and even added a nice picture. i have seen pages with two lines in them and they are not on this list User:Luvingazula 21:19, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Avatar: the Last Airbender d20

This has been here ever since I got here. What are people going to do with it? 888th Avatar - Talk - Contributions 06:53, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Well? What are we going to do with it? The 888th Avatar (Talk) 10:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
It outdates me too, or so I think. I say delete, let's create a vote and end it. Joey - Talk Contribs 10:27, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
I'll take it to VfD. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 10:34, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Is it useful in any way, or can the information me moved to an existing category?Dexms4 13:30, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Post here. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 13:33, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Locations in Avatar

Why do you want to delete the page? It just list all the locations in avtar instead of having to go to diffrent pages to see the locations. The page is easier then all the other smaller pages, and list more then the other pages.JKH3942 04:07, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

It is useless. As I have said on Talk:Locations in Avatar, there is a category for locations, accessible from the bottom of every location article. This suffices as a list. There is also a template. This will be deleted. The 888th Avatar - Talk 04:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Why dose it matter if the page is there? It's not effecting anything. So just leave the page there.JKH3942 04:12, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

It matters because we shouldn't have pages that are unneccessary. All the information on this page is repeated elsewhere. It doesn't even suffice as a general location article or a geographic article, because there is a The World of Avatar article and a Four Nations disambig page. There are so many pages that fulfil the purpose of this page, it is just ridiculous. The 888th Avatar - Talk 09:22, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

The page is unnecessary, as 888 pointed out, there are other more efficient means to find those locations. I'll delete it. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 11:40, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


Sorry, but it was long ago decided by debate that Omni would be the one who would apply/change the featured article on the main page. This template will only serve to cause disruption if allowed to exist. That is the reason for this action. Zero Sign - Zero - Talk 13:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

On second thought I'll just edit the template to make this more acceptable. Zero Sign - Zero - Talk 13:46, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Little boy Article

why is this a canidant for S.D.? its fixed now so can i move the delete tag? Vaznock 22:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

I have removed it. The 888th Avatar - Talk 00:24, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

giant panda

deleat it is Hei Bai whi is a spirt not an animal User:Luvingazula 14:37, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

aangs's relationships

why is this page up for deleation or am i grapping the wrong end of the stick? User:Luvingazula - Talk 20:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

ok it does not matter i just grpped the wrong end of the stick as i said User:Luvingazula - Talk 20:02, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Unknown Earth Avatar

I propose speedy deletion. Vaznock 18:10, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

I actually think this has been deleted before. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 19:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

This has been deleted before, by Howabout1 on 07/03/08. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 19:34, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Might as well delete it again. Vaznock 19:34, 22 February 2009 (UTC)


Can we keep this image? It's good, it can be used for some articles, and it is being used on my user page already. Vaznock 20:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Using copyrighted images as profile decoration is not something that falls under the fair use auspices. Also, that image is very similar to Image:ZukoVAzulaSR.png, which is being used on one article. One should replace the other. ― Thailog 21:03, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Okay. Replace it. I'll look for some other images to add to my profile that can be used. Vaznock 21:06, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Turtle Frog

Is this going to be deleted or not? Vaznock - Talk 19:23, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Huh? Why is up for deletion? The 888th Avatar (Talk) 03:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

It's a duplicate of Badgerfrog. Vaznock - Talk 21:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Ah, I see. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 22:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


Who created this? --Crown Prince headpiece The Firelord - Talk 21:07, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Vaznock. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 21:10, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

It was a redirect to my page, but the community decided we shouldn't do that, so it went "bye bye". Vaznock - Talk 23:19, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Avatar ozai 5

Fan art. Must I say more? —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 23:45, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for the heads up. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 23:45, 6 May 2009 (UTC)


I just uploaded an image of Aang holding the picture of a LionTurtle, which he found in Wan Shi Tong's library, in The Library episode, but it was immediately marked for 'speedy deletion'. I'm a new user, and was slightly disconcerted; did I do something wrong? I thought a visual demonstration would help with the written point, which was about foreshadowing for the season finale. I'd appreciate if someone could explain to me or set me right, thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Midoriko-sama (talkcontribs) 20:05, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

You did nothing wrong, you just accidentally uploaded a lower quality duplicate of a higher quality version. is a site filled with good quality images. Hope that explains it. :) Vaznock - Talk 20:08, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Midoriko-sama, I explained why I marked the image for speedy deletion on the edit summary. It is a duplicate of File:Lion Turtle.png. That's all. ― Thailog 20:11, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks Thailog! To think, non-tech-savvy me spent hours trying to figure out a screen cap and then how to put it up here. *rolls eyes at self* I'll replace the image with the .pgn version, and thank you for the heads up. Midoriko-sama - User talk:Midoriko-sama</font> 22:38, 14 June 2009 (UTC)


What's wrong with the image?--Twilitlink 08:31, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

It's only used on fanon. ― Thailog 08:31, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
sorry but what does that have to do with any thing?--Twilitlink 08:48, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
It has to do with the fact that before the merger it was decided that Avatar images would only be used on fanon pages if they already used on main space articles. For more information, you can read my conversation with Kai about this. ― Thailog 09:02, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Fair enough--Twilitlink 09:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
So, what, now we have to re-upload them all for the main wiki? Sorry, but that is generally unfair to the fanon users. The Flash {talk} 17:11, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

No, but we do lose most of our images. And I agree, it's unfair that the Avatar Wiki policy has prevailed over Avatar Fanon policy in this image thing, when we were told we'd be able to make our own policy, that's why I'm not liking this merge. But let's not pour out our frustration on Thailog. He is just working hard to reduce images, so we can't be mad at him. However, I am a little upset that this image policy problem wasn't addressed when the merge was proposed, or it wasn't addressed openly. Vaznock - Talk 18:05, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

  • @fanon editors: I foresaw this problem once the merger was proposed and I was the only one to raise the issue, eve though I'm indifferent to fanon. Our community has been trying to reduce the number of non-free images on articles for some time before the merger, and as I was aware that the fanon community used non-free images as well, I was worried that your image policy (which was using any image whenever needed) would hamper our efforts. So, I asked the question and 888 replied that images from Avatar would be used on fanon articles as long as they were already being used on a mainspace articles. And that was very public for everyone to see. Personally, I preferred that no Avatar image would be used on fanon (for several reasons), but I was willing to compromise. And assuming that the fanon community would like to be allowed to use every image they wished, 888's reply seemed like a fair and reasonable compromise for both sides. And I don't need to mention that none of you bothered to timely object. It was only one of the first posts before anyone else besides me voted. Surely you didn't miss it. Since most of you voted against at first, I assumed that the image policy was one of the reasons. However, since you later ended up supporting the merger, I assumed then that you had accepted that policy, in spite of being a departure from your own. However, now you claim that this in unfair and even unheard of. Both sites could never share the same space without stepping on each other's toes, and remember that you accepted to be gobbled up by the Avatar Wiki, and not vice versa. And I even pointed out the obvious issues that the fanon community would have to deal with after being assimilated. Image usage was one of them. Seeing as we share the same site, we can only have separate policies for separate namespaces. Files are shared by both communities, and the Avatar Wiki can't go back on their policies and goals to accommodate your wishes. I do understand your frustration, but this is why I raised all these concerns during the debate. I guess you were too quick to change your votes without weighing all the possible downsides and ramifications before the fusion. I'm sorry, but you only have yourselves to blame here. ― Thailog 19:23, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
That still doesn't leave out the fact that this was a horrible decision to do so. Every single fanon page now has red links and a lot worse then they ever were on the wiki before the merge. Thailog, you have to understand the recent changes changes fast; to actually see any of the messages to talk pages requires someone to stay on the page for a long while; I don't usually myself. When I saw all the delete tags I assumed it was just for some other reason, but then I saw that every single image from the fanon was deleted. I myself am very upset by this and find that this has to be one of the biggest downsides to the merge which was not pressed on enough. I understand we don't want too many fairuse images, but quality is just as important and this has effectively battered our pages. I understand we were warned but I still object to this part of the merge. Nothing personal to you, Thailog, just speaking my opinion to the general public. The Flash {talk} 20:23, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
All I can say, and ask Thailog said, it's the policy. If feel against it, feel free to bring it up as a policy change. Joey aa 21:17, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Thailog is right. We are to blame. Now, I would of liked it if 888 or Joey, instead of putting in a comment in a page filled with content that easily hid it from our eyes, put it in their original proposal instead of letting us figure it out. But honestly, we are at fault. We should of thought it all through before we supported the merge. At fellow Fanon Admins: Now, this is how I see things, if we hate the idea of living with little to no images, but we still live, I guess we can just go along with it despite frustration. But, if we just can't live with no images (I doubt I can), then I suggest we return to Avatar Fanon.

(Now my opinion) Honestly, I am pro-returning to a separate wiki. But if the image policy is changed (I find it perfectly understandable that you Avatar Wikians wouldn't want that), the sidebar is cleaned up, and some links and quotes are fixed automatically (I am going to try to finish that up in the next three days) then I'll be happy to stay, and I'm sure that's the case with some of the other fanon admins. Vaznock - Talk 22:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

As I said above (I get the feeling it was skipped), policy is policy. As Thailog has stated several times, yet apparently none of you picked up on, the policy was instated based on the lack of disagreement, because nobody really saw it (I guess would be the explanation). So, if you now show disagreement, open a forum, start a vote, and change that policy. It's that simple. Policies are based off of what users want and agree to, so they can fluctuate. Simple. Joey aa 22:52, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
I suppose that is the best way to handle this. I just have that gut feeling it's going to fail in the eyes of the fanon. But, still, Joey is right, policy is policy. I do agree with Vaz, though, in most parts that is. The Flash {talk} 23:17, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Basically, me and Joey said the same thing. While it's our fault that we didn't think this through, it would of also been nice if the issue was brought up in a more noticeable matter (the top of the page in which the proposal is), and not sandwiched between a lot of text. Vaznock - Talk 00:46, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

I made that proposal, and no-one objected, so I assumed that the reason for this lack of objection was that everyone agreed on it. However, if fanon users do want to upload images specifically for their stories, it is entirely possible for them to start a forum and make a discussion on the issue. I personally don't think that copyright is that much of an issue, as long as no-one tries to make money out of their story. Wjxhuang, the 888th Avatar {Talk} 03:14, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
I'll start it. The Flash {talk} 03:20, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
If the fanon users don't want to use canonical images for their stories, they can use their fanart drawings or images from animes or mangas instead, there is no issue for those things. Zukofan - Talk 06:09, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Avatar Kyoshi airbending fan art, why is it up for deletion?

What am I missing here? That artwork is a fanon piece, I drew it myself, it contains no questionable contents and I made sure all the criteria to post things on Avatar Wiki were met. So why is it up for deletion? - [W. Jaegers]

I'm not 100% sure, I didn't put it up for deletion, but I think a full story is needed other than a discription of the picture. Maybe if you wrote a story about Kyoshi's time among the Airnomads it might not get deleted. Again I'm not 100% sure but it's woth a shot.--Twilitlink 22:43, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Yep, that was it. And there is nothing wrong with the picture or anything, its just there is practically nothing there but a picture and barely a sentence.--Avatar Talk 22:57, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Unedited fanon articles

Over the past few days, I have tagged numerous articles for deletion for being unimproved, and yet they have not been deleted. Is there any reason besides just not being active? --I'm The Bos - Got something to say? - Read Guardian! 17:48, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

It's been a busy week, but you were saying...? Joey aa 19:01, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Q: about Winged lemur images

The reason why I uploaded those, was for them to be used (at least) for the Winged Lemur article. The current image used is having Momo in shadow, you can barely see the markings or how the creature looks with all the darkness present. Bunai82 (talkcontribs) 11:19, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Well, until they are actually used, they are of no use to the wiki. If you add them to the article and the change is kept, then the files could stay (I guess). --I'm The Bos - Got something to say? - Read Guardian! 18:47, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
It would have been nice to at least let me do that, instead of using speedy deletion. Bunai82 (talkcontribs) 09:53, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
If I remember correctly, they were up for hours without being used. I assumed that they were (like many other images) uploaded and forgotten about. --I'm The Bos - Got something to say? - Read Guardian! 13:10, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
I never forget something I uploaded, I have my own wiki to maintain so I do indeed use images when get the time for it (I do take breaks). If possible, can these images be appealed so I can try to put them in the Winged Lemur article? Bunai82 (talkcontribs) 00:17, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
If you want the image back, then you would need to contact an admin, as they are the only ones with that power. --I'm The Bos - Got something to say? - Read Guardian! 00:57, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

Well I contacted one of the admins and s/he said to make a Talk page on here, still no word. Bunai82 (talkcontribs) 06:35, May 8, 2010 (UTC)

The questions that need to be answered are: are the pictures good, is there somewhere they can be used? Be it adding a new image or replacing an already existing one? Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 23:14, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
Not sure how to see up a discussion, so I just titled it as such. But yes, I feel the images are much better at displaying what a Winged Lemur / Momo is, without that shadowed screen cap. Bunai82 (talkcontribs) 04:26, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
Can I at least get a chance to see if the images work out better than the current ones? Bunai82 (talkcontribs) 15:07, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
...? Bunai82 (talkcontribs) 20:51, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

AGAIN: Q: about Winged lemur images

Could at least one of the images be undeleted so I can try to see how it looks on the Winged Lemur article? I've been rather patience with this even though I have gotten no solid answer. Bunai82 (talkcontribs) 19:56, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

File:Ep20-453.png and File:Ep20-339.png

Don't delete them. I do use them only on user page, becuase I need them there. And what do you mean "unlicensed"? SpongeWriter123 (talkcontribs) 15:43, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Each image on the wiki that is a screen shot of Avatar: The Last Airbender must have an imagebox filled out. In addition, there is a policy that states that there will be no images that aren't used elsewhere. --I'm The Bos - Got something to say? - Read Guardian! 15:57, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
Well, I "licensed up" them. SpongeWriter123 (talkcontribs) 18:43, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
That doesn't change that they are only used on your user page. If you use them elsewhere, then they probably could stay. --I'm The Bos - Got something to say? - Read Guardian! 19:11, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
? I'm new here, but I don't get what's wrong with images used only on userpages. The images were uploaded for my userpage, so I don't get why you should delete it. What should I do? Delete my userpage? SpongeWriter123 (talkcontribs) 04:57, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
Again, see this policy. It explains why. --I'm The Bos - Got something to say? - Read Guardian! 10:20, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
I read this before, and I know why, but this is not reason. And you already deleted my images! SpongeWriter123 (talkcontribs) 11:00, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Firstly, I didn't delete your images. Secondly, that is reason. All the reasons mentioned on the page says "any screenshots and images whose copyrights belong to Nickolodeon or Paramount, can only be used on user pages if the image is already in use elsewhere on the wiki. In short, this means that users should not upload Avatar screenshots specifically for their user pages" That's the bottom line. Everyone, from new users to Admins are bound to that policy. That's why you are. --I'm The Bos - Got something to say? - Read Guardian! 11:24, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Then you can as much block me! SpongeWriter123 (talkcontribs) 12:46, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
You really can't deal without those images on your userpage? --I'm The Bos - Got something to say? - Read Guardian! 13:11, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I can't. SpongeWriter123 (talkcontribs) 17:55, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I can't. SpongeWriter123 (talkcontribs) 18:34, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Jonathan Archer image

The image 220px-Jonathan Archer 2161 dress is actually in use by my Fanon:Jonathan Archer article. So, why is it a candidate for deletion?Graywand2 (talkcontribs) 21:44, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

I don't know I think it's because of TV/Movie copyright i originally used the Character Darth Maul as a image for Fanon:Krios and the images were deleted.SSJ-Trunks 21:40, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

But it's the image of the character from the show he originated on, Graywand2 (talkcontribs) 21:44, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

Mhm must be the fact its real life not Anime/Manga Oh by the way loving the Star Trek Theme SSJ-Trunks 21:47, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

I already have a real-life image up here. Under my fanon:Erika Hernandez article. Omnibender deleted it because of a computer error and I explained it and he put it back.Graywand2 (talkcontribs) 21:58, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

Maybe this will work with the Jonathan Archer Image SSJ-Trunks 22:10, June 18, 2010 (UTC)


Why is it up for deletion they already have a page revealing it so what is the point

Why delete the Bending styles, moves.

They are need to help people out.

What pages are you talking about? --I'm The Bos - Talk - Guardian 21:04, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

Other types of bending

why is this up for deletion as it is an informational article about sand bending, blood bending, and others.

this is something that many people may be wondering about. please giv my article a chance.

it is empty and you can just write about sub bending in the main bending article IE bloodbending in the waterbending pageCourage the Cowardly User (talkcontribs) 03:43, July 23, 2010 (UTC)


This page was made by an annonymous user, however we already have a page for this character under fanon where it will stay until we get confirmation.Courage the Cowardly User (talkcontribs) 23:06, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Poetry in the World of Avatar

Why is this page up for speedy deletion it was Request in the 5-7-5 Society Disscussion and Songs in the World of Avatar has its own Page Mway (talkcontribs) 04:17, July 27, 2010 (UTC) Mway

this page should be deleted, it does not have enough information and should be in the arts in the world of avatar pageCourage the Cowardly Dawn's Past 04:18, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

As with all Pages it starts small and there is much smaller ones it is a work in progress and putting the poetry itself on the arts page would clutter said page Mway (talkcontribs) 04:20, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

who many poetries have been in the show? it does not have enough info to warrant its own pageCourage the Cowardly Dawn's Past 04:22, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

Single mentions of unseen animals are given their own page and this isnt i have about 5 more quotes to add and it is better to give it its own medium sized page than clutter the already gigantic one unless you can convince who ever it was that said it couldnt be on Arts or 5-7-5 that it should merge with 5-7-5 it should be left alone Mway (talkcontribs) 04:25, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

5 more quotes is still a very small article and can still be put into the arts page, we do no tneed every instance of peotry.Courage the Cowardly Dawn's Past 04:30, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

We do every instance of song Mway (talkcontribs) 04:31, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

but that is a medium sized article and 5 poems dont warrant a pageCourage the Cowardly Dawn's Past 04:34, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

Review my latest edit and one sugesstion (Merge Song and Poems) Mway (talkcontribs) 04:35, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

if we merge song and poetry i think it would be good, ppoetry is still too shortCourage the Cowardly Dawn's Past 04:41, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

Ok then do we need a third party or do we just do it Mway (talkcontribs) 04:42, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

we need an adminCourage the Cowardly Dawn's Past 04:45, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

Ok thank you Mway (talkcontribs) 04:46, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

While the event of poetry does exist, these World of Avatar are meant to be big, encompassing Avatar worldwide things. Unseen animals mentioned once are listed because they were referenced. With WoA, it is sort our own interpretations. I'm not completely against it, but it could exist as a redirect to the Literature article? Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 01:20, July 29, 2010 (UTC)

Sokka's Boomerang

May I ask why this is a candiate for speedy deletion? CAPace1 (talkcontribs) 21:05, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

not enough info and we already have an article about itCourage the Cowardly Dawn's Past - SoF 21:07, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Where is the article other than this one, and others may help to improve it.CAPace1 (talkcontribs) 21:24, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

it is in Sokka's WeaponsCourage the Cowardly Dawn's Past - SoF 21:27, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Sokka' Sword is in there, and it has its own articleCAPace1 (talkcontribs) 21:29, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

cause it actually has enough info to have an articleCourage the Cowardly Dawn's Past - SoF 21:33, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Can you please remove this Restarting the War. It use to be mine but I remove all of the properties on the page unto another one I remade.


Why do you want to delete the page entitled The Royal Vessel?

It was never named, never reffered to, it may be the same as Azula's ship, and it doesn't have enough info to deserve a page, no references to it, not even on Nick.comCourage the Cowardly UserSokka-sprite 07:24, August 29, 2010 (UTC)


I think this page was supposed in the Fanon section. VJavatar is awesome(talkAR)Azula Sprite 16:00, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

Adain:the dark one???

why is adain on the speedy deletion list??? did i violate any terms or anything by posting it??? if so plz leave a message on my homepage

I added it because a category is not where we put a characters history, we make hem in fanon sections and our site is not dedicated to your fanon.Courage the Cowardly User Talk Contributions 02:50, November 13, 2010 (UTC)

oh.... i didn't notice it was on the wrong place and not just on the fannon, my bad

Thelightningboy (talkcontribs) 02:54, November 13, 2010 (UTC)Thelightningboy

What are Komodo Rhinos, How to catch a Howler Monkey, Dragon Hawks


Exactly. Vulmen (talkcontribs) 16:23, November 14, 2010 (UTC)


I created the page this morning -- forgot to sign it-- to talk about whether a comment that those were the characters deceased as of the end of Last Airbender and possibly adding one for Korra when the time comes. Dcasawang1 has only the cryptic comment, "This is not the right place to write that."

I guess I'm confused. Are not the Talk:<subject> pages where a discussion should take place about what should happen to a page? Should I instead just go in and make changes willy-nilly like a bull in a chinashop?

DesertDog (talkcontribs) 22:57, November 29, 2010 (UTC)DesertDog

Talk pages are the right place to write that, but the article "Deceased" doesn't exist, so there shouldn't exists a talk page for it. You should write it in the talk page of the category Category:Deceased. Dcasawang1 - Talk 23:24, November 29, 2010 (UTC)
Yes, you're right - and we like discussing changes - but the thing is, we only discuss changes for pages that actually exist. :) If it doesn't exist, feel free to write a blog post expressing your views, or come by the forums. The 888th Avatar (talk) 00:17, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
But Deceased does exist as a page. It's a Category page, "A list of all deceased characters on this Wiki." I found it by clicking on a link on a character's page -- I forget who. It also comes up if
"deceased" is put in the search box. DesertDog (talkcontribs) 23:07, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
Then the correct title for the page would have been "Category talk:Deceased". It doesn't matter all that much anyway. You'd be far better off writing a blog post than posting on category talk (the namespace is barely used). :) The 888th Avatar (talk) 01:24, December 1, 2010 (UTC)

Anti-evolution blog

This page is nothing but talk about evolution, science, and ninth grade geometry. Nothing in the page references to or mentions anything having to do with Avatar, it is just a big page of talk. I feel this is unnecessary as a page, but perhaps to ask the Anon. who created it to sign on as a user and post this as a blog instead of a page. Thoughts?

Support Support — This has absolutely nothing to do with Avatar.Chapreyes (talkcontribs) 04:28, December 16, 2010 (UTC)Chapreyes

You don't have to support
-- Courage the Cowardly User (Talk) (Contributions)

Long Feng's Bison Whistle

Why is this up for deletion? There isn't anything wrong with it, no one else as mentioned it anywhere, and BTW, I've seen some even more pointless and small pages than this so why again. Gimme a good reason. BTW (again), if this isn't important, Aang and the gang find Appa an episode early, long feng doesn't capture appa and the episode lake laogai is a piece of junk, and that episode won an emmy.-Spo55

Criticizing one of the series' great episodes won't win you any supporters, Spo. LF's bison whistle is an item that appeared for approximately one or two seconds of screen time, and as far I saw, there was no information on it in the article anyway. The item does not have nearly enough background to warrant an artilce for it. Lovelyb0nes (talkcontribs) 19:29, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

Srry, BTW wasn't criticizing the episode (even though now that i look at it i sounded like it), i meant that without the whistle, long feng doesn't capture appa and the gang doesn't look for him or go to lake laogai. Thus, the creators woundn't have made that episode. Also, if you think this page is up for deletion, there are page with less importance and less show time than this. For example, the moon peach page has one sentence, and it has been up for deletion at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spo55 (talkcontribs). This note was added on 04:10, January 23, 2012 (UTC).

I'll check out the moon peach page, but I have to say that it would be more sensible to tack the whistle onto Long Feng's page versus giving it its own article. Lovelyb0nes (talkcontribs) 19:39, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

As per Lovely Bones. Policy is that we document every piece of information from Nick's site. That may be a reason for why we have a page about Moon Peaches. I suggest reformatting the page Bison Whistle to be a general page about the object in general, and make two sections; one for Aang's and one for Long Feng's.

Waterbending emblem Water Spout 20:06, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

I think it should be deleted. It is already in Bison Whistle. Renatabls Zuko Sprite 20:28, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

Yes I did add it in the Bison Whistle page, and then Renatabls follow up and added another sections to the BIson Whistle page. So, I'd say this discussion is closed.-Spo55 03:18, January 14, 2011 (UTC)

Palace Woman

This is in reference to the woman shown in the palace in the "Earth King" episode. I think that there is too little information on this article, for instance, Palace Woman isn't her confirmed name, she is seen for 2 seconds of show time, and all she does is scream "BURGLAR!" and fall on the floor. I put an expansion template on it, but there is hardly anyway it could be expanded. I suggest deletion. It could be added to the "Earth King" episode page if not already. Please respond with your thoughts.-Spo55 18:12, January 14, 2011 (UTC)

Well, you didn't do this right, but whatever the case.
WS, somebody, input? I think it's going to stay. I'm guessing it was likely on or something? Why else would it be there. Vulmen (talkcontribs) 18:20, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
No I didn't make it. Maybe it was on Nick, but I never saw it on the website or anything special on AvatarExtras.-Spo55 21:03, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
I remember a page for it on, something along the lines of,"She is one of the women in the Earth King's court,etc."-- Courage the Cowardly User Message Me Friends 21:19, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
Maybe so, but I didn't see it. By the way, who wrote that comment above? Remember to sign your signature with four ~, or by pressing the signature button. Spo55 - Talk 21:16, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
"I didn't see it" isn't a reason to delete it, the site is gone, but having it deleted would mean we would need to delete numerous articles and much of our information would be gone.-- Courage the Cowardly User Message Me Friends 21:19, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
If things like the Cabbage merchant can have a page, Why can't she? They are both characters that are un important. Toph Lover !!! 21:32, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
I think it should not be deleted, it has canon and real info about her, she appears in a:tla, and she said something. This is a wiki about avatar and we have to put everything that we see in the series. Renatabls Zuko Sprite 04:33, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Keep KeepWaterbending emblem Water Spout 04:36, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for speedy deletions. Pages that are eligible for speedy deletion are pages that clearly violate pre-existing policies i.e. there is absolutely no doubt that the page could be allowed to exist. Pages that may or may not belong to the wiki, depending on the opinions of users, don't belong here (they should be discussed here) and will never be considered for speedy deletion by an administrator. The 888th Avatar (talk) 09:57, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Please do not mark pages for speedy deletion if they are not clearly policy violations. Use {{VfD}} and discuss the page on Avatar Wiki:Votes for Deletion.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Prickle Snake Image

Hey, I saw an image I uploaded was a candidate for speedy deletion because it was unused, however it is in the page Prickle Snake, so why is it up for deletion? It has source and licensing? Spo55 - Talk 02:25, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

The image you uploaded into the article was removed. AvaFan (msg) 02:35, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

The article is too small to have an image. Renatabls Zuko Sprite 02:39, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

What Renata said. Dcasawang1 - Talk 02:43, January 20, 2011 (UTC)


This page contains nothing but a template and an explanation refering to how the user Kat-DaughterOfAphrodite is not a Waterbender. AvatarFreak21 The First Storybender 10:22, April 9, 2011 (UTC)

Yes check Done The 888th Avatar (talk) 13:25, April 9, 2011 (UTC)


Posted as an article but is clearly meant for userspace. Katara Sprite Season 3PSUAvatar14  Talk  Contribs  Following  01:05, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

Yes check Done The 888th Avatar (talk) 01:05, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

Katara and Zuko drawings!!.jpg

Both only used by Dragon75934 in their userpage.

Katara Sprite Season 3PSUAvatar14  Talk  Contribs  Following  18:21, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

Yes check Done Also considering, rather than doing this, just editing and adding {{delete}} to the mentioned article/etc. That achieves the same effect, except no location to discuss the speedy deletion, if this is a downside. Vulmen (talkcontribs) 21:52, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

Black Snow

Why would you delete this page? there's no need to (Agent Slash 20:33, April 17, 2011 (UTC))

Fanon:The Bride King

First off, it should be fanon. But it talks about this guy marrying Toph and Azula. Should we really be allowing a polygamic fanon here? KataraFanboy Send me a messenger hawk Read my fanon! 20:00, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

It's also low quality. --AvatarRokus Ghost (Message meRead my fanon) Aang Cosmic Toph-DoBS-2 21:30, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

Yes check Done Vulmen (talkcontribs) 01:14, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Tokka Support Template

I hardly consider the subject at hand to be a moot irrelevant point, and would of course like to keep it. That being said, I can see that the general consensus is against me, and I suppose there is not much I can do at this point. Metalarmor Talk 0 Edits! 17:49, June 28, 2011 (UTC)

Might I suggest removing it to your user space, Metal? TAD, theavatardemotivator - talk 18:06, June 28, 2011 (UTC)

Dragon (title)

As Lady Lostris already stated, the article lacks in sufficient information/elaboration to justify for a page. The content already exists in the Dragon page. Axiovatar Talk 11:12, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

Flora and Fauna in the World of Avatar

It should be deleted. Unnecessary disambiguation page. --Bahjy1 Message Wall Blog 17:46, January 10, 2012 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.