Avatar Wiki
Advertisement
Avatar Wiki
Profile image change   Profile quote change  Votes for deletion
Archive filingcabinent

Speedy • 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16

Votes for deletion is where discussions on whether an article should be deleted are held. Any user may propose the deletion of a page on the wiki; before nominating an article for deletion, ensure you are familiar with the wiki's deletion policy.

Procedure[]

  1. The proposer posts their nomination for deletion below under Current discussions. The proposer must support their nomination with a sensible reason for why the page should be deleted; nominations without an accompanying reason will be summarily rejected. Common reasons for deletion are:
    • the subject of the article is too minor to warrant a page
    • the information contained in the article is already noted elsewhere
    • the information contained in the article would be better added to an existing article
  2. The proposer must then apply the {{VfD}} template to the top of the article nominated for deletion.
  3. Discussion about the proposed deletion can begin immediately. An administrator may retroactively reject the proposal if it is deemed inappropriate.
  4. Any user may reply to the discussion, and should indicate their opinion using {{Vote delete}} to support deleting the page, {{Vote keep}} to support keeping it, and {{Vote merge}} to support merging the information into another page.
  5. Since this is a discussion, a reason should be provided for each vote. Votes without a valid reason may not be considered when determining the consensus.
  6. The consensus of the discussion will be determined by an active administrator and carried out after three days, starting from the last relevant comment.
In order to speed up the process, it can be beneficial to withhold your vote when you agree with the majority. Adding your own vote will reset the "three days without comment" waiting period for consensus.

Current discussions[]

Closed discussions[]

Korra's Bending Skills[]

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:

Page deleted.

Please do not edit this discussion.


This page is irrelevant just like the other article the user has created. Korra's bending skills is already on her main article under Abilities. Should a page like this be acceptable? Delraymisfit (wallcontribs) 05:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete Delete — Completely agreed. Its just as uneeded as the one for Aang, the content here is not worthy of its own page. Aeriux (wallcontribs) 5:27 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Aang's Bending Skills[]

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:

Page deleted.

Please do not edit this discussion.


As the addition of this information to Aang's article led to an edit war, I am opening this up for a VfD discussion as a way to come to a consensus on whether this information is valid to be added, and also as a separate article. HAMMEROFTHØR (wall) • 12:19, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete Delete — As I stated during the discussion regarding the additions to Aang's main article, this content is utterly unnecessary. For once, most currently known bending skills are already subjective interpretations - we have few skills which are actually named; most listed on the bending pages are given names by the editors. Accordingly, one could possibly interpret nearly every minor bending move or adaption as a "new" banding skill for individual characters, making any "bending skill" list extremely prone to both bloating as well as fanon-level interpretations. Lastly, we should not just create lists or articles for no reason - they should add valuable, well-sourced information to the wiki. What exactly do "bending skill" lists add to any character articles which is not already conveyed by the summaries of the bending abilities? In my opinion, they add nothing of note. DyingFlameTsui (wallcontribs) 13:36, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete Delete — All of the information is fine in Aang's page. Dcasawang1wall 17:59, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete Delete — The information doesn't need its own page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AvatarPhoenixGrey2 (wallcontribs) 23:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Fire Lord Headpiece[]

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:

Page deleted.

Please do not edit this discussion.


Delete Delete — This page needed to be deleted asap because the user who was responsible created that page only just put "it's cool". Also that article was titled capitlized the first three letters. Also see Fire Lord headpiece, that is unless we need a redirect link instead. Kunoichi101 (wallcontribs) 06:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

I have already deleted the article, given that it was just vandalism there is no need to go through VfD. HAMMEROFTHØR (wall) • 09:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Yasuko Sato Building[]

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:

Page deleted.

Please do not edit this discussion.


Delete Delete — I don't think there is enough information to include in this page. What we know is already under the short sections in Future Industries and Cityscape of Republic City. Dcasawang1wall 20:15, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Zhu Li (battleship)[]

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:

Page deleted.

Please do not edit this discussion.


Delete Delete — This information is already included on the battleship page, and even with some general cleanup to the article I don't think there is enough specific information for this to warrant its own page. HAMMEROFTHØR (wall) • 01:33, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Delete Delete — There isn't enough information to separate that battleship from the main article. Dcasawang1wall 15:05, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Yu Dao crisis[]

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:

Page deleted.

Please do not edit this discussion.

This article is a recently created fork of Harmony Restoration Movement and Battle for Yu Dao. It is a very small article with no new or separate information and basically copies all of its content from the two older articles. There is no reason to maintain such a small fork. DyingFlameTsui (wallcontribs) 10:16, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Delete Delete — I don't see the benefit of having a separate article for this when it adds nothing else. Dcasawang1wall 22:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Bao Yu[]

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:

Page deleted.

Please do not edit this discussion.


Article about a place(?) mentioned once. The context in which Bao Yu is mentioned makes it impossible to say what Bao Yu is, let alone where it is. The article is complete speculation, assuming that Bao Yu is a town near Republic City, but it could be also a district, a village, or a named crossroads. With no more sources, the article could never be expanded beyond "Bao Yu is a place". Thus, all information on this place(?) is sufficiently covered by other articles. DyingFlameTsui (wallcontribs) 13:32, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Delete Delete — I agree, this location does not have enough information to warrant a dedicated article. Since it was only mentioned once, this information likely fits entirely within the episode article that it was mentioned in, Old Wounds. Zacatero • (Wall) • 15  20  15 17:21, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Keep Keep — Avatar wiki should cover all aspects of Avatar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bolin69420 (wallcontribs) 18:50, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

I don't think anybody here disagrees with that statement, however whether or not something needs it's own article is a different story. We would still be covering this information, just not in a dedicated article. Zacatero • (Wall) • 15  20  15 18:50, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Per proposal. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 19:11, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Per Omni. It was only mentioned once and the article has all information there is already and has two lines. Dcasawang1wall 21:34, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Yang Province[]

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:

Page deleted.

Please do not edit this discussion.


Recently created article on a province mentioned once. We know basically nothing about the province, and the article reflects this, being two sentences long. As it is, all information on this province is sufficiently covered by other articles. DyingFlameTsui (wallcontribs) 13:16, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Delete Delete — I agree with the proposal. As was my opinion with other VfD's of similar topics, this information can clearly exist entirely within the one episode article it was mentioned in, In Harm's Way. Zacatero • (Wall) • 15  20  15 17:23, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Per proposal. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 19:11, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Same reasoning than my vote for Bao Yu. Dcasawang1wall 21:34, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Advertisement