|
This is a page archive.
Please do not add or remove any content from it. (50,961 bytes)
|
Article Nominations[]
Featured articles -> A-class articles[]
I don't believe the following articles need much discussion for promotion.
The 888th Avatar (Talk) 04:13, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. Though Azula doesn't have a good history. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 04:16, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
| This article was promoted. |
|---|
Coup of Ba Sing Se[]
Suggestion by Flash on IRC. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 04:37, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Good article, deserves the status. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 15:53, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
| This article was promoted. |
|---|
Writing in the World of Avatar[]
This page has a lot of content and is presented neatly and accurately, but that last incomplete section is probably a cause for concern. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 00:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- I also agree and would like the page A-Classed. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 01:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hmmm, I still have my doubts about that last section... The 888th Avatar (Talk) 11:32, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 04:27, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
| This article was rejected. |
|---|
Invasion of the Fire Nation[]
I nominated this article because it is a very high standard article in terms of length, prose and tense. The amount of images there is ideal, and there's nothing lacking there. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 14:11, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Great article. I say go for it. Vaznock - Talk 01:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Very nice. It could use some minor clean up. There were very few grammatical errors, and even less now that I have fixed them. So, I say pass for an A-class Article. Mattkenn3 Talk 20:58, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
| This article was promoted. |
|---|
Society in the World of Avatar[]
A failure of an introduction. It would also benefit from a bit of expansion. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 05:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- Then let's do so. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 14:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes, lets! Vaznock - Talk 01:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
It isn't ready to be an A-class Article, yet. Mattkenn3 Talk 21:05, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
| This article was rejected. |
|---|
Architecture in the World of Avatar[]
The main content of this articles is certainly great, but I don't think this should be promoted on the basis that it's introduction sucks at the moment. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 05:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- We'll have to fix it up then, aye? —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 14:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Agreed, but lets keep the article pending, since this is only an introduction. Vaznock - Talk 01:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
I don't know. The content looks pretty good. The introduction is terrible. There isn't enough information on the architecture in the Water Nation, at least provide an image. This article needs a good bit of images so that the reader may better understand what these places look like. I say no, for now. I'm sure this will become an A-class Article, soon enough. Mattkenn3 Talk 21:21, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- In summary, this article is okay, but it does need refinement. See how this article goes next time round, but for now, it has been rejected. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 22:16, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
| This article was rejected. |
|---|
Final Agni Kai[]
Its pretty good, but not the best it could be. Vaznock - Talk 17:37, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- It is the best it can get; a very nice and smooth rundown of the whole duel, nice grammar, etc. I agree to it's A-class. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 21:52, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Now that I've taken the time to read more than two sections, I agree with you, Flash. Oh, and you know something funny, I'm the one who actually nominated it! My memory must be going. Vaznock - Talk 18:38, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- Yes. And it has good images. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 22:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
It does have nice visual aid. The text isn't squished too badly, either. I think it looks good. It won't get much better. But, I'm not entirely sure about an A-class promotion. Mattkenn3 Talk 01:18, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- So, it's decided then? —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 01:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
| This article was promoted. |
|---|
Geography of the World of Avatar[]
The article needs a better introduction and more content. Although the content provided is good, there simply isn't enough. The article needs more content and maybe a change in formatting. What do you guys think? Mattkenn3 Talk 21:40, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- The problem with this article is it is difficult to provide more content when its purpose is a summary. If we made it more detailed, then it would make the individual articles less important. In my opinion, we should cut the lowest tier of headings and instead put those sections as dot points under other sections. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 22:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. It isn't ready. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 20:58, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
| This article was rejected. |
|---|
Sozin's Comet, Part 4: Avatar Aang[]
It's a good, well written, and non-image cluttered article. What more can I say? Vaznock - Talk 18:48, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Yes. it is well written. But I don't know if an episode article should be A-class Article. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 18:50, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
It looks pretty good. As a response to Dcasawang1's comment about an episode article being an A-class Article, if the article is well written and worthy of such a title, it should be promoted to the position. Mattkenn3 Talk 23:27, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Ok. I said because we would make a difference between an episode and the others. But now, I understand Mattkenn3. It almost does not need corrections. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 18:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- I think it's about time we give an episode some credit. In my opinion, it deserves both A-class and FA. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 21:52, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Not sure about FA, that's up to the community, if I'm not correct. But, It deserves an A-class promotion. That's three for, so it's an A-class Article. Mattkenn3 Talk 01:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
| This article was promoted. |
|---|
History of the World of Avatar[]
Looks fine. No major issues. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 05:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 14:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Excellent article. Really deserves the status. Vaznock - Talk 01:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Very detailed information. Well organized. But, is there any way that we could write the article in a bit more of an encyclopedic fashion? I think it looks great but, I think we can make it look better. Mattkenn3 Talk 21:08, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- The problem with the encyclopedic fashion is that it makes it difficult for the reader to know dates at a quick glance. I suppose we could write an encyclopedic section, and then include a timeline, but that would mean a lot of work. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 00:17, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
That's three-four users. I'll promote it. Vaznock - Talk 18:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
| This article was promoted. |
|---|
Astronomy in the World of Avatar[]
Seems...a bit...empty? The 888th Avatar (Talk) 05:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- Perhaps.... —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 14:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Somewhat, but the content is excellent. Vaznock - Talk 01:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
I need much more to convince me that this article is worthy of being recognized as A-class. I have a problem with the images. There are too many for so little content. If the article has enough content to support and back up the images, they should be kept. But in this case, there is not enough content to support the images. I say we get rid of some images, add much more content, and re-post the images when there is enough content to support them. Mattkenn3 Talk 21:18, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- That's true. I have always been a little annoyed at the image clutter on some pages on this wiki. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 22:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
I think that the first section is good, but the parts of the objects and places are very empty. I think it should be improved for the incorporation to the A-class articles. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 23:05, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
It needs some corrections and improvements. It does not look as a good A-class Article. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 22:26, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
So, how many users support the promotion? Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 20:53, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- I think a bit more work is needed here. For now, I would reject it; its nomination has been up for a week. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 23:18, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
I would reject it too. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 23:27, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Hmmmmmmm......I don't know........reject. Vaznock - Talk 23:29, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
(3 users) Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 23:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
| This article was rejected. |
|---|
Escape from the Boiling Rock[]
I don't like the way this article was written. It needs to be more formal, these event articles are supposed to be textbook style retellings. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 05:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- I agree, though it is still worth A-Class. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 23:20, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Nah, I would want it to be a higher standard before it is given A-class status. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 03:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- Okay. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 14:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
I've changed it to past tense, and 888 says he'll make other changes. Now, after seeing his work, it can largely be assumed the article will be A-class worthy after he's done with it. Vaznock - Talk 01:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes. It looks much better since the last time I had seen it. It could do with some work, though. I'm sure, with a little bit of time and effort, this article will be ready for this "promotion". Mattkenn3 Talk 21:11, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
I'd of made the changes already, but I don't completely understand what 888 says by tone. But like I said before, when 888 fixes something, it really does look much better. Vaznock - Talk 23:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry about that guys, I'll look into it now. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 23:17, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
No need to feel sorry. I feel bad that I couldn't of done it! Vaznock - Talk 23:21, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
888 has made some great changes. So, lets decide. Is the article worthy of promotion? I say, probably now, it is. Vaznock - Talk 01:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, I'm not quite finished with it yet. :) The 888th Avatar (Talk) 01:47, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Wow, 888. Keep on going! You're doing a great job! Vaznock - Talk 02:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Alright now I think its time to decide (I'm hoping 888s done). His work has been great on the page, and I think all the really bad parts are pretty much fixed. So, now, lets decide. Is this page to be A-classed? I think: Probably yes. BTW, thanks for all your work on the page 888! Vaznock - Talk 13:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- No problem, but I won't be a part of this decision. I'll let you guys decide, I haven't got time to think about it now. Bed time beckons. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 13:48, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
I think it should be an A-class Article. It has been corrected and improved many times, and the article is now completed. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 18:28, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
So, what is the decision? I think the article deserves the promotion. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 19:57, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
As do I. It just needs one more approval. What does Flash think? Vaznock - Talk 21:43, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
This article has been pending for a while. Flash and/or Matt, can you please end this or continue discussion? Vaznock - Talk 02:00, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Any replies? Vaznock - Talk 23:50, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm going to say no. Sorry, I think it is very close, but not ready. It's up to Flash. Mattkenn3 Talk 01:39, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Nothing's wrong with it, imo. Let's dub it. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 19:46, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Wow, this article took awhile to promote. Now lets archive this thing outta here! Vaznock - Talk 19:49, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
| This article was promoted. |
|---|
Politics in the World of Avatar[]
This page isn't too long, but it has very good and important content. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 00:09, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
I think it needs to be expanded a bit more. Vaznock - Talk 13:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Needs more expansion. It's not ready, yet. Mattkenn3 Talk 23:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, it needs more expansion. I wrote the article with a focus on getting the basic info across. By no means do I consider the article complete. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 08:11, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
(3 users) Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 21:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
| This article was rejected. |
|---|
Long Feng[]
This is a pretty good article actually. Other than those jarring AvatarSpirit.net images and a few ugly uses of present tense... The 888th Avatar (Talk) 14:06, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
If this is to be A-classed, then Mai, Ty Lee, Suki, and Ozai should also be A-classed. Vaznock - Talk 01:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
I have to agree with Vaznock on this one. I don't think it's ready to become A-classed yet. Again, there are too many images for my liking. I hate squishing text with images. If there is enough content to support them, keep them. But as of right now, I say we cut out some images. Mattkenn3 Talk 21:02, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Go ahead. I think there are too many images on some articles. Just becuse images are so easy to obtain for this wiki's subject doesn't mean we can have more. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 22:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- I like the article; deserves the class. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 21:52, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
It looks much bettter, now. It's been edited a good bit. The article is close. Mattkenn3 Talk 19:54, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm being a bit too critical. It looks fine. Let's promote it. Mattkenn3 Talk 19:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Yes. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 21:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
| This article was promoted. |
|---|
Team Avatar[]
Nothing wrong with this page. Nice to read and easily sorted. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 00:39, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
I was a going to nominate it, but then I read the History section. Much of the grammar is terrible. Vaznock - Talk 01:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Like Vaznock said, there are a few grammatical errors. I can't say anything about that. I have that problem. But, there are a few grammer problems. Other than that, there is really nothing too bad. The article looks pretty good. It looks purple. Mattkenn3 Talk 02:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- In other hiding place, Zuko confronted Katara about her distrustful disposition towards him and though of a way to gain her friendship. He decided to help Katara :find the Fire Nation soldier responsible for killing her mother. Together they found the man, but Katara is unable to take her revenge out on :him. After returning, Katara finally forgived Zuko and accepted him in the team.
This is just one random line. Spot the errors? Vaznock - Talk 02:14, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes, and your point is what? Mattkenn3 Talk 02:17, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
That there are much more lines just like this. Of course that would be my point. Vaznock - Talk 14:14, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- This article needs more work. In my opinion, nothing passes if the grammar errors are really noticeable. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 08:15, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Right. And addition to the gramatical erros, the history of the Book 1 is very incomplete. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 19:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
That's three-four users. Reject. Vaznock - Talk 19:31, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
| This article was rejected. |
|---|
Southern Water Tribe[]
This article is fairly well written and it doesn't have image clutter. Its a pretty good article. Vaznock - Talk 17:37, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Pretty good. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 21:52, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
I don't think it's ready. The image clutter at the top needs to be fixed. The Games section doesn't even need to be mentioned, in my opinion. This small line of information isn't very significant. I tink we should just cut that section out of it. Mattkenn3 Talk 01:22, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
All of that is do-able. Vaznock - Talk 02:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with Mattkenn3, the section of Games should be removed, or included in the section of customs the ice dodging and the "games" (just Penguin sledding) together. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 20:50, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Just one more user to agree. Vaznock - Talk 14:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not sure, but at this stage I'd give it a narrow pass. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 14:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
| This article was promoted. |
|---|
The War[]
Don't know why this article wasn't promoted at the start. Its long, not cluttered, and well written. Vaznock - Talk 21:43, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- In my opinion, it is pretty cluttered. The sections seem kind of dull. I'm planning on rewriting it, though I guess it does deserve some A-class. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 21:52, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. It deserves the class. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 22:14, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
And I think it deserves both too, FA and A-class. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 22:48, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
I don't think it's ready for either an A-class or a FA. It is somewhat cluttered. Like, SuperFlash101 said, the sections are dull and don't really catch my attention. The article contains massive amounts of relevant information and is worthy of recognition for that. But, it isn't ready for an A-class or a FA. Mattkenn3 Talk 01:29, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
The image clutter can be revised. The dull sections also can be revised in just amatter of days. Vaznock - Talk 02:00, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
It's close. It needs more work, though. After a good edit session, the article will look much better and will be closer to the quality of an A-class article. We need to work on it. This article has great potential. Mattkenn3 Talk 02:27, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
:I'm going to be rewriting this, so this might want to wait. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 22:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm actually just going to rearrange some things, rewrite some runoffs, add things, etc. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 22:15, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Well, the changes have been done, and the page looks better. What do you think? Dcasawang1 - Talk 05:16, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
I think it's ready. Vaznock - Talk 14:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 21:21, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
So, 3 users. Dcasawang1 - Talk 20:42, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
| This article was promoted. |
|---|
Order of the White Lotus[]
This article is well written and it has important and good informartion. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 23:07, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- No. The article isn't ready. Not even close. There is some image clutter in the beginning that needs to be fixed. There is not enough content. The article needs a good bit of expansion before even being considered for this promotion. I say no. Matt (talk) 22:45, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
I agree. Its much too small. The importance of the article is what gave it its featured status, but an A-class standard is definitely not going to ever become an aspect of the article. Vaznock - Talk 23:10, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- Unless a lot more work is put into this article, I would be really against this article's promotion. A-class articles need to be very well developed. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 08:03, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
| This article was rejected. |
|---|
Southern Water Tribe raids[]
The article has no image clutter, and its well written and quite large. Vaznock - Talk 22:49, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Right. No image clutter; but I think it needs one more image in the Aftermath and Significance section. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 16:39, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe an image of Kya with Yon Rha. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 18:05, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Looking back at this, this page is in very good shape. All for A-classing it. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 22:28, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
I think the article is pretty good, but I do have a small concern about the images.The 888th Avatar (Talk) 23:28, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, forget that comment about the images. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 23:30, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
So, should we promote it? Vaznock - Talk 14:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- It looks fine to me, I support promotion. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 14:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
That's three council members. Vaznock - Talk 15:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
| This article was promoted. |
|---|
Battle at Wulong Forest[]
I wondered into the page, and I saw some things that surprised me. I saw a very tiny Aftermath section that could be expanded, along with some image clutter on the bottom. I don't necessarily want to demote the article, I just want to put in on "probation". Vaznock - Talk 19:02, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- I would disagree with that. There isn't a whole lot you can do with the aftermath section; not much that we know of happened after the battle. The series ended like five or ten minutes after the battle anyway. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 06:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. It should conserve the position. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 23:07, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Hmm. If we find it unworthy of the A-class status, demote it. I wouldn't want our article ratings to be represented in any other way then they are supposed to. If we demote it, we can always re-nominate it and have it's A-class status given back. Matt (talk) 02:58, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Even so, that can be fixed without discussing its demotion. I think posting on the talk page would have been more appropriate than a full-blown demotion discussion. Articles should only be put here if we are seriously considering a demotion. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 08:04, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- By the way, I couldn't find many "also's", I found just two. The aftermath section, in my opinion, sums up the result pretty well. We don't have any further information that we could give in that section. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 08:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Only one more thing we know, what happened to Azula (it was added). Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 18:39, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- So, do we keep it A-class? —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 01:39, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
I think so. Am I not correct? Matt (talk) 02:20, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes, I'll just expand the Aftermath section as much as I can. Vaznock - Talk 18:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
| This article was not demoted. |
|---|
Mai[]
This a fairly good article, as it's larger than Ty Lee's and it doesn't have much image clutter. Vaznock - Talk 18:44, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Hmm. The article is decent. There is less image clutter. But, I don't think that it is ready for an A-class promotion. Mattkenn3 Talk 23:24, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- I think the article doesn't deserve the status; not using a basic AW styling, and used episode names in every sentence. And, Matt, I've noticed you don't like "image cluttering;" most of those pages you've called as such have a lot of images, which is a must for reference. It all depends on the placement. Though I'm positive you know that already, I'm just restating. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 21:52, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes, I'm aware of that. Thank you, anyway. Mattkenn3 Talk 02:15, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
So, what should it be? Vaznock - Talk 14:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think this article is deserving. I dislike it because, in my opinion, it could be better written. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 14:50, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yes. And it could be expanded a bit more. Dcasawang1 - Talk 21:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
| This article was rejected. |
|---|
Ozai[]
Other than some image clutter, the page is pretty good. The words flow smoothly and the content is presented nicely. Though there are a few bad uses of the present tense. This article could be fixed up easily. Vaznock - Talk 19:46, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- The page would be pretty good with that gramatical corrections that you said, remove 1 image, and the expansion the section of Personality with a new image. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 21:55, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
The only image clutter is under the Abilities section. Fixing that, clean-up, and a bit of grammatical correction could make this article worthy of the A-class promotion. Mattkenn3 Talk 23:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- No, actually, I believe you mean Personality, Matt. Abilities is perfect. The problem with Personality is Imprisoned over runs it with it's image. Anyways, I really like this page, and agree with it's promotion. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 20:54, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
That is how it is now. When I critiqued it, the article was different. These articles change rapidly when the five of us are tearing them apart and fixing them up. Mattkenn3 Talk 07:01, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- I still find the image clutter on this page really annoying. In fact, all the main and secondary character articles could do with some image removal. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 08:26, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
I still think it's worthy of promotion, though. Vaznock - Talk 14:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I have removed and replaced some images, and I think, now, it deserves the promotion. Dcasawang1 - Talk 22:25, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- I feel this page is now worthy, so with majority support now it will be promoted. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 10:07, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
| This article was promoted. |
|---|
Article Demotions[]
Aang[]
I know this seems crazy, but this article has some big problems. It has two sections under construction. This wouldn't be so bad, though we did not promote Writing in the World of Avatar because it had a section under construction. Plus, the article has some poorly written sections, as any humongous article would. I'm not suggesting demotion, but I am pointing it had to every body that we've reached a serious problem. Vaznock - Talk 01:36, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hm, I just removed the UC tag from "Personality" since someone nicely added the needed info, and so there is no construction left. It's a full page. I still do not like the episode names mentioned and some summaries directly copied in it. —Excelsior, The Flash - (Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!) 02:39, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- So, the page has only one UC tag, and it's easy to expand that section. Dcasawang1 - Talk - Contributions 19:45, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
But there are also other poorly written sections. Vaznock - Talk 14:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- This article is not focused. I've had a long-standing problem with this article. In the past, I attributed this merely to length. But really, more importantly, the reason I dislike this article is its lack of focus on the subject of the article. It seems to merely recount all the episodes Aang is in. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 14:59, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
So that's two, and maybe three users. Vaznock - Talk 20:57, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
I have to agree with 888. The article has some issues. Mattkenn3 Talk 21:18, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
So, should we demote it? Vaznock - Talk 21:22, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Not yet. I say demote, you say demote. Flash and Dcasawang1 are against the demotion. I'm not sure about 888. I think he wants a demotion but, lets wait for some confirmation. If he wants a demotion, the article will be demoted. Mattkenn3 Talk 02:13, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm voting for a demotion. The article needs a lot of refocusing and finetuning, particularly considering its importance. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 05:29, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- I am not against the demotion. Dcasawang1 - Talk 17:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
| This article was demoted. |
|---|