All posts by Hamze12345
.
Based on the timeline, he should be 112.
But physically speaking, he's 12.
I don't see "all the above" answer.
Like what Brick said, it has anime components like animation and plot that revolves around stopping some major event (100 year war). The protagonist, Aang himself gives off some qualities that an "average" anime character has an is focused on a single goal throughout the story.
Aang's is to stop the 100 year war, Luffy is to become Pirate King, Naruto wants to become Hokage, and etc.
It showcases adventure in which an "average" anime would have which leads people to think it is one.
@Toasterbath2 Every single goddamn time I see you on a post, you say the same thing. It has NOTHING to with nostalgia at this point, ATLA just has better characters, character development, plot and so much more than TLOK. Your always trying to say TLOK is as good as ATLA yet the only reason why most people watched the series was due to it being a sequel to ATLA. Just stop spouting shit.
While I don't think TLOK can even compare to ATLA, I didn't necesarily think it ruin too much. I did dislike how crappy the past lives where lost in S2 and how illogically broken Amon's bloodbending was, Season 3 and 4 had pretty good villians and a decent plot.
But anyway, most people thought that it ruined ATLA as it had built up on so muh things, yet it got ruined like how a waterbender can become near the level of an Avatar (Amon) and the pastlives over the course of thousands of years got destroyed in a mere minute or so because of bad writing. Also, UnaVaatu vs Spirit Korra was probably the stupidest and illogical fight in the series.
Tenzin slaughters Unalaq LMAO. Unalaq isn't even that good of a waterbender, while Tenzin on the other hand managed to fight 4 red lotus members while weakened and he could've defeated them if it weren't for P'li.
Zuko was stated to have mastered firebending and was taught by the firebending masters in Book 3, so I would say Zuko wins.
Debatable. I would say Katara wins 6/10 times as her water properties hard counter Azula's arsenal, but it definitiely can go either way.
@Matias56 That is so objectively false. You say it doesn't have mature themes, yet there is genoicide, bloodbending use for enslavement, animal cruelty, brainwashing, abuse and many more. And yet your saying that it doesn't have mature themes.
The only some-what complex character in the story is Korra herself. On ATLA, there's Zuko, Azula, and Ursa. Again, there are more that don't really need to be explained, yet each of them are more complex then the others.
The only reason why you can even think TLOK action is better is due to animation, other than that ATLA outclasses them in every other aspect. Zuko v Azula and Aang v Ozai is literally better than any TLOK fight we've seen to date.
It doesn't really matter what you think at this point, as the only reason why anyone dares to watch TLOK is because it is a sequel to ATLA. I can guarantee you that much.
All the above...
There has been better theories in where he airbent all the air from his room, killing him and all the firebenders as it seemed like Gyatso hadn't got burnt to death.
Again, when I refered to Aang holding back, I was talking about that fact that Aang played MAJORITY on the defensive, as he hadn't wanted to cause harm to Ozai.
And I don't give a damn whether you care or not, you making fallacious arguments.
Pakku was far from his prime, and he could debatably defeat EoS Zuko in a 1v1.
Nothing's cap, your just an ignorant kid that can't debunk crap.
Let me put this as simple as I possibly can. What defeats enemies? ATTACKS. What did Aang react to? ATTACKS. MEANING, that OZAI can't defeat Aang if his attacks can't hit him, on the other hand Ozai was getting hit and tagged by AIR bending which does the least amount of physical harm. Also, Ozai only reacted a few times, while Aang reacted to Ozai's FASTEST ATTACK, LIGHTNING. Meaning that Aang scales tiers above Ozai's attack in speed.
When I meant "passive movement" I mean he hadn't wanted to fight.
Your too arrogant, so just stop trying to debate and argument you can't win.
You still haven't debunked crap. Your just spamming stuff, attempting to debunk an argument that I haven't even made, hence the fact that your making a strawhat argument.
He literally stated he didn't want to fight, ontop of that he was trying to play on the defensive as your ignorant self should know.
In the comics though, it begs to differ.
The only one making fallacious claims is the likes of you.
Aang literally was a near-master, if not a master of waterbending EoS. So again, I've been showing claims that you just keep denying.
No, you've really been twisting my words. Also, I am aware, but he focused on other stuff.
I NEVER SAID REACTING TO SOMEONE MAKES THEM STRONGER MORON, STOP TWISTING MY WORDS. I said he was reacting to them, easily at that, piting him above his attacks meaning he is faster than Ozai's attacks.
He literally was on the passive movement as you can clearly see. Stop denying facts.
@Ice-jin Nice analysis. Also, I kinda agree, but I would say that Makorra was more of like a simple dating relationship, while Korrasami was an attempt for a long-term relationships over 4 seasons, but they got ruined by Nickelodeon as they didn't want kids to see a lesbian relationship.
You haven't debunked my argument at all. Your trying to claim the fact that Aang was in the avatar state when he energybent, yet I debunked you constantly yet your too arrogant. I have nothing to gain from debating someone as annoying as you, so be how you shall be, it's no longer a problem for me.
I'm really not mad. I just despise debating arrogant children who has 10+ fallacious arguments on his side without showing and hard proof, nor statements, feats, narrative arguments are really anything decent. Your just too arrogant to accept the fact that your wrong, in which you constantly replying back without making any decent claims.
So if you basing it solely on the show, even than it can still be debated whether anyone is blitz tier above another.
Yes but you can't compare Aang's waterbending in which he can bend a chunk of an ocean to some fodder waterbending.
K
Ok, but were arguing whether Base Aang can defeat Ozai. Base Aang can use energybending, meaning it is still in his arsenal, meaning he can use it to put Ozai down.
No, because he was playing passive in which he had stated before the fight he hadn't wanted to fight. Also, Aang is a literal airbender, the are known for being pacifist and avoiding fights. Ozai literally made a quote saying that Airbenders where weak due to them being pacifists.
You still haven't debunked anything. Your just making fallacious arguments, in which you can't support it with any hard evidence, thus proving you've lost this debate.
I mean, I didn't think neither of them was rushed as Korrasami had small details every know and then that you needed to focus to actually understand.
Makorra was more small-time dating as in having a crush on someone, but the relationship only lasting for so long (i.e. 3 or so months)
So I guess I would say Makorra was more rushed.