<div class="quote"><i>
<p>Weltall8000 wrote:
It's more likely the reverse.
</p><p>Most people don't veer toward being left handed, does that make it morally wrong to be left handed? Some cultures believed that to be evil and to this day lefties are still discriminated against.
</p><p>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bias_against_left-handed_people
</p><p>Consider how at this point in time, being left or right handed or being straight or gay, is widely accepted as not a conscious choice. Also, note the parallels about forced reconditioning of both groups to become a member of their opposite and how even the language is stacked against being the minority group.
</p>
</i></div>
<p>Apples to oranges. Studies have shown that even left-handed people who have been forced to write with their right hand still preferred their left hand for other tasks. However, there have been thousands of testimonies of former homosexuals who have willingly overcome their same-sex attractions and abandoned their homosexual lifestyles for good. You could say that they were never gay to begin with or that they're denying who they are, but couldn't you then say the same thing about pedophiles and drug addicts? How could you say that those things are so different, other than being "a matter of choice", "unhealthy", "harmful", "illegal", and "wrong"?
</p><p>Plus, it doesn't change the fact that promoters of homosexuality also have an agenda.
</p>
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>You know, what's inherently wrong with incest or polygamy for that matter? Barring possible birth defects from incestuous breeding (which note, many people support both directly and indirectly with breeding in animals, like dogs for instance. While not humans, would this not be immoral of them to support?), why is there a morality issue between consenting individuals in incest, polygamy, or homosexual relationships?
</p><p>Thing is, it is a pretty simple matter, some people are attracted to and want to pursue relationships of romantic nature with others of their same gender. Why should they not be allowed to? Why should they be discriminated against? If you don't like it, fine, don't like it, I'm not asking you to, but how are they objectively bad or wrong for doing so? Why should they have laws against them? Why should they not be provided the same opportunities and enjoy the same protections as straights? And even not able to have characters in shows that share this quality with them, because either A) "it's morally wrong" or B) "it's 'controversial' so let's just leave it out"?
</p><p>What "reason" is that? Because historically being generally attracted to the opposite sex has been benefitial to humans because it helped bolster our numbers? Are we really concerned about not having enough people at this point in time? Do you realize that we don't absolutely need to have heterosexual married couples in order to produce and raise children?
</p><p>Sooooooooooooo what if Desna and Eska had a relationship going on? Jamie and Cersei Lannister do in A Song of Ice and Fire, has society collapsed because one of the most popular book/television series in the world has a prominent incestuous couple?
</p><p>Frankly, Tenzin would have been a great argument for the case of polygamy. He was the last adult male of an essentially extinct people and it would have made a whole lot of sense for him to be having many children to save the airbenders.
</p><p>Quite the opposite, I argue that neither are inherently wrong/evil. If Korra and Asami liked each other and wanted to date, they should, because the characters wanted to. If not, why should you or I be allowed to date anyone of the opposite gender, because of their gender? I would also additionally restate that another potentially good reason for Korra and Asami would be to make the statement that being gay is okay and to play a part in including gays into mainstream society, rather than merely tolerating them...as long as they remain invisible...or continue to outright overtly ostracize them.
</p>
</i></div>
<p>So you think that polygamy and incest is acceptable? Wow, that says a lot about you. In that case, if you're right, how about you advocate for all three examples that I've brought up, send your suggestion to Bryke and Nickelodeon, and see how they respond?
</p><p>BTW, this thread should have been closed long ago, because now it's clear that Korra does not have a new romance in Book 3.
</p>