In the Avatarverse, very few characters are pure evil. But, many characters are villains. Over the years I have seen many defenses of these villains (what they do, how they act, etc.) that make me laugh or wonder if the person understands the show. So here are some that I find funny (my commentary is in italics):
Sozin was in the right to kill the airbenders
Sozin's sister Zeisan wanted to throw a coup against him and the Guiding Wind (a sect of airbenders) supported her. Thus, the airbender genocide was just a preemptive attack.
First off, genocide is wrong, so I don't think anyone can justify that. Second, it wasn't much of a coup. Zeisan was peacefully trying to get rid of the nobility and undermine her brother's authority. She wasn't actively trying to attain the throne. In the end it's funny to me, as the defense falls apart from the title.
Azula is a perfect saint
Azula is an absolutely wonderful person. She has done nothing wrong or evil compared to her traitorous brother and uncle. Zuko hits people and yell at his crew and his Uncle does nothing to stop him. Meanwhile, Azula never hits her crew and has discipline over her companions. Also, Azula wasn't violent in her taking of Ba Sing Se compared to the White Lotus. And unlike her brother, she never tries to kill him and yell at him that he ruined her life and other such cruelties. She also loves her brother, unlike how he hates her.
Though I don't think Azula is pure evil, she sure has done a lot of evil and wrong. The problem with this defense is that it only justifies itself from the lens of Zuko and Iroh suck. It fails at giving any evidence that is not just surface level, and also has many contradictions to it. It also conveniently forgets the fact that it was her idea to burn the Earth Kingdom and that she says she’d be happy by Zuko’s death (“I’m celebratinng becoming an only child”). It makes me laugh from how unsupported it is, and also the idea of Azula being the hero of the story (still want her to be redeemed though, and also f Azula in the Spirit Temple).
It was fine for Long Feng to kill Jet
Killing terrorists who threaten the peace is fine. Thus it was okay for Long Feng to kill Jet, because Jet was a terrorist.
Though Long Feng is someone who I would not call very evil (and someone that is possible to defend in some ways), Jet's death was pretty evil. Jet had done nothing wrong within Ba Sing Se to justify his death (I don't think disturbing the peace with Zuko counts as a killable offense), not to mention he was a child. It's kind of funny in a sick sort of way. The fact that someone would think that it was fine.
Ozai's burn down the world plan was okay because it was just disciplining his subjects and also good for the environment
Politicians should be allowed to discipline their unruly subjects, and if they are especially rebellious and bad, drastic measures are called for. Like burning their home down. That's all Ozai was doing. So it isn't an evil thing to do. Also, forest fires help the environment, so Ozai burning the forest was good for wildlife.
It makes me laugh because I feel like it's common sense that what Ozai was doing was wrong. Doesn't matter if it was discipline or not, it was still awful.
Kuvira was right to purge people
Kuvira wanted to keep the Earth people safe, and thus the people who had come from elsewhere were a threat. They had to be locked up for the safety of the "true" Earth people. Also, the camps she put people in are not described well enough for us to know how bad they were, so you can't really judge.
Ethnic cleansing is bad. What Kuvira was doing is the definition of ethnic cleansing. And it's laughable that someone would defend this. I think that's actually a common theme among these theories.
Amon was right to take away benders bending
Amon was just making everyone equal. Bending was making everything unfair, and he was just setting it right.
It's funny because it feels like the defender didn't watch the show. or at least think about it. Amon wasn't making things fair. Bending wasn't what caused inequality in Republic City. A factor in it? Yes. The cause? No.