Also once someone said that Zuko has a better understanding of Air Nomad Culture than AANG because he read scrolls when he was searching the temples (something he would NOT do) and now he “teaches” Aang about HIS culture by telling him the Air Nomad’s kill people

Also also Iroh’s gift to Azula was getting her to “empathize with Earth Kingdom girls” and NOT collections from Imperial conquest

Well besides…everything else like any fandom, the biggest thing that bothers me the most is diehard Azula defenders. I landed into a big rabbit hole filled with people portraying Azula as this innocent person who did nothing wrong. I have seen people portray Claudia from the Dragon Prince as this evil and irredeemable character but these same people would drag out their sympathy to Azula, a person who’s done worse than Claudia.

Korra series and her defenders

I dislike the attempts at connecting the Elements (Fire, Air, Water, and Earth) to the Periodic Table of Elements. The point of the show is that it is a Fantasy World. Trying to explain the Elements through Science ruins the mystical nature of the Show.

Oh, wait, I wanted to say what annoys me about the fandom. And so.

Andrey Vasin.

@Nnnnnnnnnnnnnmmmmm Who?

You don't know him, but he's a wall man. the number of messages in disputes with him can easily exceed 200. and all his arguments can be divided into 5 categories

1-outright nonsense, like "character a is better than character b, because character b is worse than character a, seasoned with insults.

2-appeals to something completely unrelated to the topic of conversation. you can discuss with him why blue fire is NOT superior to red, and he can abruptly switch to the basics of psychiatry and the diagnosis of azula, while repeating this endlessly until he realizes that it does not work

3-denial and ignoring. you can throw him moments from the series, scenes from comics, and just various background information, but he will persistently pretend that it does not exist, and continue point 1 or 2.

4-directly follows from point 3. ignoring any facts that contradict his picture of the world, he at the same time stubbornly asks for proof of your point of view. this happens according to the following scheme: "throw off the proof"->proof-> ignore, departure from the topic-> return->"throw off the proof"-> ... at the same time, he perceives his fantasies, unsupported by anything, as an immutable fact. once they argued with a man about the legend of aang, he said that ehaz had stated on Twitter that there should have been a season 4. his opponent found a tweet where ehaz denied it, but Andrei pretended that it did not happen.

and the last, 5th point, which is the quintessence of Vasin-links to his own comments. it looks something like this:

first, he writes some kind of comment. it may actually be something reasoned, but that is easy to dispel (but more often corresponds to point 1). you dispute his comment, which starts the argument. after a while, he, proving a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT thesis, throws a link to his comment and asks to challenge it, following paragraph 2. you parry by throwing a link to your comment that disputes it-he goes to paragraph 3, pretending that this comment does not exist. and finishing it off with point 4, he throws links to the thesis that has already been challenged 100 times and asks to challenge it.

I was still new to the avatar fandom, it was 3 years ago. but people who had already argued with him said that holding out against him for as many as 300 messages was an admirable level. if you rate the things that annoy me in the fandom on a 10-point scale, then he will get 10, even if the second most annoying thing after him gets 1.

Right now the guy that acts like he is some kind of a creator in ATLA and his opinion about whether a comic is cannon or not matters... And also seems to call everyone ableist because they see Azula for what she is meant to be

And this is exactly what I warned against, directly targeting or calling out other users is not appropriate. This will be locked.