<div class="quote"><i>Ironbender wrote:
If you can’t tell between pandering and a good story says a lot about you.</i></div>
<p>So does branding every story you don't like with an inherently coded term like "pandering." Your point? </p> <div class="quote"><i>What is hilarious is how I mentioned I liked Korra and Asami interactions in ruins.</i></div>
<p><i>Ring-a-ding-ding</i>. It remains that you were crying about "pandering" in one breath and saying shit like this: </p> <div class="quote"><i>You disingenuously asserted: I digress the toxic behavior resulted because of the clear pandering and other pointing it out. If you didn't like the pandering you are labeled a homophobe.</i></div>
<p>...in the next. Trying to backpedal out of it means precisely jack. (And have you ever considered that the reason <i>why</i> throwing words like "pandering" around gets you accused of queerphobia—<i>if</i>, in fact, <i>that even happens in the first place</i>—is that speaking of queer content in terms that wouldn't sound out-of-place from Focus on the Family, paired with the complete <i>lack</i> of a solid argument in favor of your claim, <i>looks suspicious as hell</i>?) </p> <div class="quote"><i>You people have nothing better to do than harrass people you don't like typical trolls.</i></div>
<p>Nice self-victimization you've got there. Get back to me with that crap <i>before</i> you insulted everyone who disagreed with or called foul on you (or just didn't rise to your bait). And, for that matter: before you posted what got you reported again.  </p><p>And as for the "troll" accusation?  That's <i>funny</i>, coming from someone who so clearly has no interest in either good-faith discussion or in taking accountability for their own actions. </p>

<p>Sorted. If it happens again, it may be better to start a new thread. </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Fruipit wrote: Sorted. If it happens again, it may be better to start a new thread. </p> </i></div>
<p>Thanks for clarifying, I wasn't sure before if new threads should be started for new incidents, or new individuals. </p>

<p>This was fine: it let me go through and wonder how he hadn't been banned before for language use, let alone everything else. I'm happy to keep using this thread; it's simply because it's already quite long xD </p>

<p>I definitely complained about it at the time. Actually, I've been complaining for ages that the Wiki has been way too hesitant to take action against people who are clearly around to spew bile. </p>

<p>I realise this, which is why he's been banned for a week. It's probably obvious but I have been absent from the wiki for some time and really have only just come back. At least in my case, it was not unwillingness, but simply that I didn't see it. Nevertheless, it's been dealt with </p>

I understand.

<p>And...quite predictably, he's still making it clear on his message wall that he thinks accountability has something to do with banking. </p>

<p>Maybe I wouldn't have said anything if he just apologized for literally trying to frame me as a neo-Nazi. I dunno, I'm just spitballing crazy ideas, here! </p>

<div class="quote"><i>Neo Bahamut wrote:
Maybe I wouldn't have said anything if he just apologized for literally trying to frame me as a neo-Nazi. I dunno, I'm just spitballing crazy ideas, here!</i></div>
<p>Yeah...ditto, except replace the Godwin with "insulting my intelligence because I said that acknowledging one's biases merits more credence than waving one's stubbornly unexamined biases like a flag."  But, then again: one needs good faith and a sense of accountability in order to apologize; he seems to think that everything is always everyone else's fault. </p>