15,253
pages
ALL POSTSReconnecting the Avatar Cycle
Is there anyway for Korra to reconnect to the Avatar Cycle once desrtoyed by Unalaq?
(Edited by Jk4000)
0
In Aang case azula just electrocuted him. Korra now just remember that raava was ripped out of Korra and destroyed. See the difference change is good even if it's not what you want.
(Edited by Dean494)
<div class="quote"><i>Dean494 wrote:
In Aang case azula just electrocuted him. Korra now just remember that raava was ripped out of Korra and destroyed. See the difference change is good even if it's not what you want.</i></div>
<p>And I disagree. The change had absolutely no bearing on Korra, the world, the story. She barely ever talked to the past Avatars. Therefore, it was just irelevant. It didn't need to happen. She was also her own Avatar already, and since people are citing that as a good reason for the severing of that connection, that makes no sense for that specific reason. She didn't listen to them, she didn't use their guidance. She was her own person to begin with. It was just a nonsensical choice from a purely technical writing perspective. </p>
In Aang case azula just electrocuted him. Korra now just remember that raava was ripped out of Korra and destroyed. See the difference change is good even if it's not what you want.</i></div>
<p>And I disagree. The change had absolutely no bearing on Korra, the world, the story. She barely ever talked to the past Avatars. Therefore, it was just irelevant. It didn't need to happen. She was also her own Avatar already, and since people are citing that as a good reason for the severing of that connection, that makes no sense for that specific reason. She didn't listen to them, she didn't use their guidance. She was her own person to begin with. It was just a nonsensical choice from a purely technical writing perspective. </p>
(Edited by Lukas Exemplar)
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>Lukas Exemplar wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">Dean494 wrote:
In Aang case azula just electrocuted him. Korra now just remember that raava was ripped out of Korra and destroyed. See the difference change is good even if it's not what you want.</i></div>
<p>And I believe you are dead wrong. The change had absolutely no bearing on Korra, the world, the story. She barely ever talked to the past Avatars. Therefore, it was just irelevant. It didn't need to happen. She was also her own Avatar already, and since people are citing that as a good reason for the severing of that connection, that makes no sense for that specific reason. She didn't listen to them, she didn't use their guidance. She was her own person to begin with. It was just a nonsensical choice from a purely technical writing perspective. </p> </div> <p>Who asked you, pal? </p>
In Aang case azula just electrocuted him. Korra now just remember that raava was ripped out of Korra and destroyed. See the difference change is good even if it's not what you want.</i></div>
<p>And I believe you are dead wrong. The change had absolutely no bearing on Korra, the world, the story. She barely ever talked to the past Avatars. Therefore, it was just irelevant. It didn't need to happen. She was also her own Avatar already, and since people are citing that as a good reason for the severing of that connection, that makes no sense for that specific reason. She didn't listen to them, she didn't use their guidance. She was her own person to begin with. It was just a nonsensical choice from a purely technical writing perspective. </p> </div> <p>Who asked you, pal? </p>
(Edited by Peter.bouchelle)
<div class="quote"><i>Peter.bouchelle wrote:<div class="quote">
<p>Lukas Exemplar wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">Dean494 wrote:
In Aang case azula just electrocuted him. Korra now just remember that raava was ripped out of Korra and destroyed. See the difference change is good even if it's not what you want.</i></div>
And I believe you are dead wrong. The change had absolutely no bearing on Korra, the world, the story. She barely ever talked to the past Avatars. Therefore, it was just irelevant. It didn't need to happen. She was also her own Avatar already, and since people are citing that as a good reason for the severing of that connection, that makes no sense for that specific reason. She didn't listen to them, she didn't use their guidance. She was her own person to begin with. It was just a nonsensical choice from a purely technical writing perspective. </div>Who asked you, pal? </div> <p>Are you saying I came off as rude? Because then just say that. I do think I did though, but only with my opening statement. I am sorry about that one Dean. You might not be wrong. But I disagree with your opinion. </p><p>Also, remember that Pathik taught us a morale during AtLA about everything being connected, that separation was illusion, and that some things are even the same. The death of the past lives is also somewhat a violation of that philosophy/morale, which was a major point in AtLA. And a message to the viewers. Of course it was kinda meant in a "Treat others the way you want to be treated" kind of way. Which, with my "dead wrong" comment, I didn't do. It's late though, I am tired. I think that's why that harsh language slipped out. Sorry, again. </p>
In Aang case azula just electrocuted him. Korra now just remember that raava was ripped out of Korra and destroyed. See the difference change is good even if it's not what you want.</i></div>
And I believe you are dead wrong. The change had absolutely no bearing on Korra, the world, the story. She barely ever talked to the past Avatars. Therefore, it was just irelevant. It didn't need to happen. She was also her own Avatar already, and since people are citing that as a good reason for the severing of that connection, that makes no sense for that specific reason. She didn't listen to them, she didn't use their guidance. She was her own person to begin with. It was just a nonsensical choice from a purely technical writing perspective. </div>Who asked you, pal? </div> <p>Are you saying I came off as rude? Because then just say that. I do think I did though, but only with my opening statement. I am sorry about that one Dean. You might not be wrong. But I disagree with your opinion. </p><p>Also, remember that Pathik taught us a morale during AtLA about everything being connected, that separation was illusion, and that some things are even the same. The death of the past lives is also somewhat a violation of that philosophy/morale, which was a major point in AtLA. And a message to the viewers. Of course it was kinda meant in a "Treat others the way you want to be treated" kind of way. Which, with my "dead wrong" comment, I didn't do. It's late though, I am tired. I think that's why that harsh language slipped out. Sorry, again. </p>
(Edited by Lukas Exemplar)
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>Lukas Exemplar wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">Peter.bouchelle wrote:<div class="quote">
<p>Lukas Exemplar wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">Dean494 wrote:
In Aang case azula just electrocuted him. Korra now just remember that raava was ripped out of Korra and destroyed. See the difference change is good even if it's not what you want.</i></div>
And I believe you are dead wrong. The change had absolutely no bearing on Korra, the world, the story. She barely ever talked to the past Avatars. Therefore, it was just irelevant. It didn't need to happen. She was also her own Avatar already, and since people are citing that as a good reason for the severing of that connection, that makes no sense for that specific reason. She didn't listen to them, she didn't use their guidance. She was her own person to begin with. It was just a nonsensical choice from a purely technical writing perspective. </div>Who asked you, pal? </div> <p>Are you saying I came off as rude? Because then just say that. I do think I did though, but only with my opening statement. I am sorry about that one Dean. You might not be wrong. But I disagree with your opinion. </p><p>Also, remember that Pathik taught us a morale during AtLA about everything being connected, that separation was illusion, and that some things are even the same. The death of the past lives is also somewhat a violation of that philosophy/morale, which was a major point in AtLA. And a message to the viewers. Of course it was kinda meant in a "Treat others the way you want to be treated" kind of way. Which, with my "dead wrong" comment, I didn't do. It's late though, I am tired. I think that's why that harsh language slipped out. Sorry, again. </p> </div> <p>Sorry about the back-talk. </p>
In Aang case azula just electrocuted him. Korra now just remember that raava was ripped out of Korra and destroyed. See the difference change is good even if it's not what you want.</i></div>
And I believe you are dead wrong. The change had absolutely no bearing on Korra, the world, the story. She barely ever talked to the past Avatars. Therefore, it was just irelevant. It didn't need to happen. She was also her own Avatar already, and since people are citing that as a good reason for the severing of that connection, that makes no sense for that specific reason. She didn't listen to them, she didn't use their guidance. She was her own person to begin with. It was just a nonsensical choice from a purely technical writing perspective. </div>Who asked you, pal? </div> <p>Are you saying I came off as rude? Because then just say that. I do think I did though, but only with my opening statement. I am sorry about that one Dean. You might not be wrong. But I disagree with your opinion. </p><p>Also, remember that Pathik taught us a morale during AtLA about everything being connected, that separation was illusion, and that some things are even the same. The death of the past lives is also somewhat a violation of that philosophy/morale, which was a major point in AtLA. And a message to the viewers. Of course it was kinda meant in a "Treat others the way you want to be treated" kind of way. Which, with my "dead wrong" comment, I didn't do. It's late though, I am tired. I think that's why that harsh language slipped out. Sorry, again. </p> </div> <p>Sorry about the back-talk. </p>
(Edited by Peter.bouchelle)
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>Lukas Exemplar wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">Dean494 wrote:
In Aang case azula just electrocuted him. Korra now just remember that raava was ripped out of Korra and destroyed. See the difference change is good even if it's not what you want.</i></div>
<p>And I disagree. The change had absolutely no bearing on Korra, the world, the story. She barely ever talked to the past Avatars. Therefore, it was just irelevant. It didn't need to happen. She was also her own Avatar already, and since people are citing that as a good reason for the severing of that connection, that makes no sense for that specific reason. She didn't listen to them, she didn't use their guidance. She was her own person to begin with. It was just a nonsensical choice from a purely technical writing perspective. </p> </div> <p>But that’s kind of the problem, isn’t it? She wasn’t just Korra to begin with, she was the Avatar. She was <i>supposed</i> to listen to them, from the beginning. And there were times, even within Books 1 and 2 (not counting the flashbacks or the whole Raava thing) where they could have been of some use. Not to mention that the Avatar State during all those times was grossly underused—none of the great power that Aang had, with the voices of eternity channeling through his mortal body, just glowing eyes and at best Raava speaking over everyone. It’s like they wanted to...kill the past? </p>
In Aang case azula just electrocuted him. Korra now just remember that raava was ripped out of Korra and destroyed. See the difference change is good even if it's not what you want.</i></div>
<p>And I disagree. The change had absolutely no bearing on Korra, the world, the story. She barely ever talked to the past Avatars. Therefore, it was just irelevant. It didn't need to happen. She was also her own Avatar already, and since people are citing that as a good reason for the severing of that connection, that makes no sense for that specific reason. She didn't listen to them, she didn't use their guidance. She was her own person to begin with. It was just a nonsensical choice from a purely technical writing perspective. </p> </div> <p>But that’s kind of the problem, isn’t it? She wasn’t just Korra to begin with, she was the Avatar. She was <i>supposed</i> to listen to them, from the beginning. And there were times, even within Books 1 and 2 (not counting the flashbacks or the whole Raava thing) where they could have been of some use. Not to mention that the Avatar State during all those times was grossly underused—none of the great power that Aang had, with the voices of eternity channeling through his mortal body, just glowing eyes and at best Raava speaking over everyone. It’s like they wanted to...kill the past? </p>
(Edited by Avatar Vyakara)
<p>If they ever continued the series after Korra, I like to believe that sometime in the future it will be a necessity for the Avatar to reconnect with their pre-Korra lives in order for some big ex deus machina ammount of spiritual power.
</p><p>Like.. I dunno. A meteor is about to hit the planet and wipe out all life and the meteor is also Satan and the Avatar State needs to be twice as powerful to stop it or something.
</p>
(Edited by Mystic Monkey)
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>Mystic Monkey wrote:
If they ever continued the series after Korra, I like to believe that sometime in the future it will be a necessity for the Avatar to reconnect with their pre-Korra lives in order for some big ex deus machinima ammount of spiritual power.
</p><p>Like.. I dunno. A meteor is about to hit the planet and wipe out all life and the meteor is also Satan and the Avatar State needs to be twice as powerful to stop it or something.
</p>
</i></div>
<p>Agreed. </p>
<p>Agreed. </p>
(Edited by Peter.bouchelle)
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>Peter.bouchelle wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">
<p>Mystic Monkey wrote:
If they ever continued the series after Korra, I like to believe that sometime in the future it will be a necessity for the Avatar to reconnect with their pre-Korra lives in order for some big ex deus machinima ammount of spiritual power.
</p><p>Like.. I dunno. A meteor is about to hit the planet and wipe out all life and the meteor is also Satan and the Avatar State needs to be twice as powerful to stop it or something.
</p>
</i></div>
<p>Agreed. </p> </div> <p>Thirded. </p>
<p>Agreed. </p> </div> <p>Thirded. </p>
(Edited by Avatar Vyakara)
0
<div class="quote"><i>D-Bunk'd wrote:
Eh, maybe Korra could reconnect with past Avatars through various items that relate to them in some way (i.e. the fire amulet that connected Aang to Roku). <p>Though (and assuming it would even work in the first place) Korra would have to come into possession of a <i>hell</i> of a lot of those types of items to reconnect with all her past lives. </p> </i></div>
<p>I was thinking that there's a spiritual residue residing in avatar bloodlines. find an artifact or descendant of the First Avatar, and boom you reconnect the cycle.Though finding a known descendant of Wan is like finding the Holy Grail </p>
Eh, maybe Korra could reconnect with past Avatars through various items that relate to them in some way (i.e. the fire amulet that connected Aang to Roku). <p>Though (and assuming it would even work in the first place) Korra would have to come into possession of a <i>hell</i> of a lot of those types of items to reconnect with all her past lives. </p> </i></div>
<p>I was thinking that there's a spiritual residue residing in avatar bloodlines. find an artifact or descendant of the First Avatar, and boom you reconnect the cycle.Though finding a known descendant of Wan is like finding the Holy Grail </p>
(Edited by ElPirato)