<p>Oookay, some related film news. From how things are shaking out after the Viacom restructuring, it looks like Paramount is going for 2 Nick movies/year, one movie as live-action and the other movie as animation (or rather, a mix of animation and live-action). After <i>Monster Trucks</i> (animated + live-action) and TMNT (live-action) in 2016, the next live-action Nickelodeon Movie for 2017 is likely to be...
Beyblade.
[1] To be produced by
Mary Parent, the producer of <i>Spongebob 2</i> and <i>Monster Trucks</i>.
</p>
<center></center>
<p>Whoa, whoa... does Paramount actually think they can get away with "whitewashing" again? Of course not. The Japanese series and films were made to sell Beyblade toys. Paramount is just making their own "original movie" to sell those toys but featuring all-new white American characters. <span title=":mrgreen:">

</span>
</p><p>Can we expect a Korra movie to be the animated Nickelodeon Movie for 2017 or later? <span title=":lolno:">

</span> I doubt it. Our friend,
Scott Aversano, the former Nick exec who fought for ATLA movie adaptation before M.Night bought the movie rights, has moved on to bigger things. Or rather,
much smaller, to produce an animated + live-action movie
[2] and possibly as another MGM/Paramount collaboration.
[3]
</p>
<center>
https://40.media.tumblr.com/3c1c32be07dd7205114bdd31f1950e35/tumblr_n8l3lm7gvO1rxme2wo2_500.jpg</center>
<p>Hey, if WB can use Lego to promote WB characters (Batman, Superman, Harry Potter, Dumbledore, etc, etc.), why can't Nickelodeon use kidrobot to promote Nickelodeon characters? If we're lucky, we might even get kidrobot Korra and friends. The best part is, you can cast any white actors you want without any racebending backlash. <span title=":thumbup:">

</span>
</p><p>What about the ATLA movie reboot? I don't think its going to happen under Paramount, even with Marc Evans in charge. I'd think the higher ups still want all future live-action Nick Movies to have the edgier balance of tones that they experimented in FUN SIZE movie
[4] and refined in TMNT that stars Megan Fox. That's what the
M.Night's reply to IGN's question was all about.
</p>
<table style="border-spacing:0; border:1px solid black; background:#; -moz-border-radius:6px; -webkit-border-radius:6px; border-radius:6px; padding-left:10px; padding-right:10px; margin:.5em auto .5em auto; width:auto; text-align:justify; color:black;" class=""><tr><td>"<i>So, you know, these are
business propositions, which have very little interest to me, of like, 'Hey, the business proposition is to get Megan Fox to be...' You know, 'You should age it 'til it's that.' That wasn't the source material, you know what I mean?</i>"
</td></tr><tr><td>— M. Night Shyamalan on adapting ATLA in the recent
IGN interview
</td></tr></table><p>Rumor has it that Paramount asked him for the rights back for a TMNT-style reboot. M.Night declined, so he figured (during that IGN interview) that Paramount (then
under Adam Goodman) had
sicced Mike and Bryan on him to pressure him into giving up the rights. To give you an idea what Paramount has in mind, the FUN SIZE movie had Jane Levy call Victoria Justice a prostitute and a giant mechanical rooster dry-hump Victoria and her friends trapped in a station wagon. And that's just the shit they showed in
the trailer. <span title=":wtf:">

</span>
</p><p>Megan Fox's TMNT is definitely NOT what studios typically make for a 9-10 year-old audience, but I like it anyway. I wouldn't mind a Michael Bay-styled ATLA reboot, if anything, just to see haters begging M. Night Shyamalan to come back. But alas, if it's going to happen, it would likely be at another studio. <span title=":shifty:">

</span>
</p>
<center>
<p>
https://41.media.tumblr.com/0ffc88eba77be9bc8cc28cf866cb166f/tumblr_nnt2ypDvss1uu0vh0o1_500.jpg
</p>
</center>