<p><span style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">Wu never formally stepped down. It’s like Book 1 ending with Tenzin declaring that non-benders would get a voice. The Prisoner’s I’m talking about are from her re-education camp, but now that I think about it we probably don’t have time for that</span>
</p><p>Okay, by that same token we never saw Zuko do anything great for the world in the capacity of Fire Lord in the series, therefore, no resolution. Wu said he was going to step down and help facilitate autonomous states within the Earth Nation. Okay, fair enough, he didn't actually do this yet, however, with him directly saying this, is there a significant reason not to believe this claim of his intention?
</p><p>So? Tenzin said he'd do this and there wasn't much reason to doubt this, and when we got book two they actually had done so by disbanding the council and having an elected president, who was a nonbender.
</p><p>The prisoners that we never saw and are reasonably released as the government holding them prisoner was decisively defeated? Why would this be a complicated loose end that needs to be spelled out for us?
</p><p><span style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">You’re probably correct about the conflict being solved with Kuvira being arrested, but it didn’t feel like an ending because we never saw the future of the Earth Kingdom. Her army is presumable arrested, everyone who got captured was probably rescued at some point, and the Spirit Vines are more than likely calm now</span>
</p><p><span style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">We didn't see the future for the Fire Nation or any nation at the conclusion of ATLA in any significant way beyond what we did in LoK. We're shown through exposition what the general plan for the Earth Nation and Republic City are.</span>
</p><p><span style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">Her army probably isn't all arrested, nor should they be, but the Fire Nation military was in exactly the same boat in that regard in ATLA.</span>
</p><p><span style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">The problem is instead of treating it like a real conclusion to an overall conflict, we skipped ahead so that Korra and Asami could go on a vacation</span>
</p><p><span style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">I could say the same thing about ATLA only replacing "Korra and Asami" with "Aang and Katara/the Gaang" and "vacation" with "make out session/tea party." So, is ATLA's a "real conclusion?" If so, you're not making a compelling case for LoK's not being so.</span>
</p><p><span style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">I acknowledge that Azula’s insanity was never resolved in the series, but my other point that she had no power anymore is still correct. The most important thing was that Azula wasn’t going to be the Fire Lord, and the only reason I’m not complaining is because</span>
</p><p>Soooooo my point still stands, that the Earth Empire's second in command was removed from power, thus resolving that...like in ATLA.
</p><p>- Its going to be resolved in the Comics
</p><p>Then, you're going to allow a few years to LoK to have comics before you criticize this aspect of LoK's conclusion, right?
</p><p><span style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">- Her defeat is satisfying to me, despite the fact that I’m a major Azula fan</span>
</p><p><span style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">Well, Bataar Jr. was a joke, so YMMV. Either way, he was decisively taken out of influence within the Earth Empire's power structure. So, again, both are the same in that regard.</span>
</p><p><span style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">The Fire Nation Military is loyal to the Fire Nation, while the Earth Empire is loyal to Kuvira.</span>
</p><p><span style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">And Kuvira submitted to the Avatar, commanding her subordinates to stand down, accepting her defeat and surrendering. If you want to claim that the EE army is a potential problem, at the end of ATLA the Fire Nation military posed virtually the exact same potential threat.</span>
</p><p><span style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">Ironically, the next set of comics will outline the Ozai loyalists and civil conflict within the Fire Nation.</span>
</p><p><span style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">Besides they dedicate Fire Lord Izumi’s scene to confirming that the conflict was resolved</span>
</p><p><span style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">Which scene, what conflict? Are you talking about a conflict decades earlier? And citing this scene, six years later as contributing to making ATLA's conclusion better/more wrapped up?</span>
</p><p><span style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">The Fire Nation colonies, were never treated as a major issue. I didn’t even think about it until I read the comic</span>
</p><p><span style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">Tell that to Avatar Roku.</span>
</p><p><span style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">Anyway, let’s agree to disagree. I think everyone is overrating the finale, and they are just glad to know that KorraXAsami is canon</span>
</p>
<p style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">There are of course, things I do like about the finale. But the reason I made this thread was because I just wanted to express my thoughts</p>
<p style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">And actually my stance on Korra X Asami has changed again, mostly because their probably just starting a relationship together. So in that case it makes a little more sense, they are probably going to date for a while unless they rush into a relationship together</p>
<p style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">If they make it into the comics, I expect more development than we had on the show</p>
<p>
</p>
<p style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;margin-bottom:0px!important;">Thanks for reading!</p>
<p style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;margin-bottom:0px!important;">I take issue with this:</p>
<p style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;margin-bottom:0px!important;"><span style="font-size:13.1428575515747px;">Anyway, let’s agree to disagree. I think everyone is overrating the finale, and they are just glad to know that KorraXAsami is canon</span></p>
<p>You came here with a controversial opinion and started a discussion on it, does it surprise you that it's now being debated? And if you really felt this way "let's agree to disagree," why even bother making paragraphs on the subject in that very post?
</p><p>It's also pretty weak to say that, then bash a widely held opinion that the finale is good, look at your phrasing "I think everyone is overrating the finale..." rather than something like "I am not a fan of how this finale worked out." The latter would be a fairly neutral expression of your personal take on it, which, would at least be easier to accept and respect, however, the former is essentially saying that people that did view it favorably are skewed/the problem. You also presume to know why they like it. Sure, KorraXAsami is a big reason that many have voiced as their favorite aspect, but it isn't for everyone and at the same time, as you state it, it diminishes it as though it's not a good reason or that's pretty much all the conclusion has good to offer. Perhaps it wasn't your intent, but as you state it, it comes off as incredibly condescending.
</p>