<div class="quote"><i>
<p>Supermensch wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">Korbl wrote:
I also wish that platinum hadn't been chosen to be the "unbendable metal." But then, I think the need to explain metalbending as "bending the earth impurities in the metal" is dumb. Metals are minerals, and "earth" is a cosmopolitan mix of minerals ranging from silica to carbon. There is literally no reason that an earthbending couldn't just be "mineralbending"</i></div>
<p>I do think earthbenders are "just mineralbending" (how else could they bend the crystals in the Catacombs?). But they can't bend metals because it's such a different state of being solid than rock and crystal. Metals are a malleable collection of positive ions, held together by valence electrons that freely move between the atoms. All other solid matter, however, is a firm structure of molecules, with the valence electrons locked into stable orbits. This is why metals bend, while rocks break, and why metals conduct heat and electricity so well. You could say that metal is different from non-metallic solids in the same way as plasma differs from non-ionized gases (and these last two are recognized as 2 different phases of matter!).
</p>
</div>
<p>See this is the thing when you get too scientific with fiction since its fallible. I don't think their going to take into account the molecular bonds between metals and non-metals and those between metals. However my argument against platinum is just on its malleability not on its corrosion or anything else, also titanium is more abundant on our Earth. While Platinum must be pretty easy to find in order to have been made into the Mecha-tank's armor and those handcuff, even if you're rich platinum is pretty expensive in the real world; today's price (2014/08/26) is $1428.00 USD/Oz (Source:
platinum.matthey.com) and apparently today's price for "ferro titanium" is $6.00 USD/kg (Source:
infomine.com).
</p>