Talk:Asami Sato/@comment-184.7.99.119-20120603204058/@comment-4888161-20120605062004

I'll admit it, I go off hints all the time. I'm not a shipper, but I predicted Makorra would happen months before the show even aired because it had that whole Kataang feel. Again, a prediction is different from shipping, so I have no vested interest in it other then being right (and even that isn't very important to me). And based off of several hints and clues, I decided to stick with this prediction even though Asami became the canon. It still seems like Makorra will win out in the end. If it doesn't, I don't care. But that's still the feeling I get, and so far nothing has convinced me to change my mind.

But none of those hints had anything to do with the infamous squint. The squint, is at most simply one of these hints (and a very minor one at that), and if not then unimportant and irrelevant. Only time will tell. But I don't make any predictions off of a single minor hint, let alone one that may not even really be a hint.

If other people want to key in on this and keep an eye out for the future, then fine. But you wouldn't believe how people have written entire theories based on this one reaction that may not even be jealousy (although it certainly was implied) in the first place. Some are even tying it into their tired Asami is an Equalist theories, which have now conveniently turned into Asami will become an Equalist in the future theories. Keeping an eye out is the most we should do with this, because at most it is a minor hint. Which is why I think people are looking into it, and am taking the reaction of many fans as the typical overreaction to whatever Asami does or does not do. Again, I apologize if this caused me to overreact.

I personally take it as nothing. And I won't even react to it until Asami presents some kind of jealous moment in the future. That is the one that would likely be the one with the impact anyways. So for now, I am ignoring this possible hint altogether. You may approach it differently if you like, but it is still nothing to make a big deal over like many are doing. So you may better understand how I think, here is my philosophy on looking for things:

I believe once is a fluke, twice is a coincidence, and three times is a pattern because coincidences don't happen (at least generally don't happen) 3 times. And that's how I've trained my eye to look at things.