Talk:Asami Sato/@comment-3411077-20120501231233/@comment-4521003-20120501234446

A lot of that theory is pure conjecture. None of the points brought up are concrete and conclusive. Instead, the writer organized the information in such a way to lead everyone to a specific conclusion.

Here's a riddle that involves similar redirection of thought for comparison:


 * Three men enter a hotel and ask for a room. The owner charges them $30 for one room, and each man pays $10.  After the men leave, the owner realizes he charged them $5 too much and gives the bellboy $5 to return to the group.  On the way, the bellboy pockets $2 for himself and gives the three men the remaining $3.


 * Since each man got $1 back, they really only paid $9 each. $9 times 3 equals $27; add the $2 the bellboy got, and the total is $29.  Where did the last dollar go?

The answer: It didn't go anywhere. The wording of the riddle leads you down the incorrect path to a false conclusion. The correct math is $9 times 3 equals $27, then subtract the $2 the bellboy got, and the total is $25, the cost of the room. So theories such as the one Curly-Brace posted may sound perfectly reasonable at first, yet upon more careful examination the "proof" really just isn't there.