Talk:Asami Sato/@comment-5123044-20120522193402/@comment-4963341-20120522221044

Now see, THAT is a legitimate and intelligent position to take (no sarcasm). It it perfectly fine to not want to hold a 100% certainty so long as there are still unanswered questions. Again, it comes down to an issue of probability and what is likely to be true. Asami being Amon is highly unlikely, for a number of reasons, but it certainly cannot be ruled out completely so long as, as you said, the mask remains on. I personaly have little doubt Amon is not Asami, but I do not hold to that 100% because anything can happen (if she IS Amon, I would argue that it was a pretty wild M. Night style twist, but I would be wrong about the initial hypothesis).

The issue is that so many posters here state their hypothesis, call it a theory (misrepresenting both the term theory, and their hypothesis at the same time), and then defend it to the death without ever conceeding that they may be wrong or have no evidence to support their postion. That is what irks me. I enjoy honest discourse and exchange of ideas, so long as all involved realize that, as of now, most of what we speculate on is just that, speculation.