Talk:Iroh/@comment-3278061-20110928165231/@comment-1025281-20111109055122

To follow on from Vulmen: I have given you (Shi Len) a multitude of in-universe evidence in my extensive replies, while you have invariably returned to a theme of "if I didn't see it on my screen, it isn't true", which is quite a simplistic view that has never worked in a real world context. It's almost as bad as claiming that humans have never walked on the moon because "if I didn't see it with my own eyes, it isn't true", or claiming that climate change isn't happening around the world because "if I didn't feel the temperature changing around me, it isn't true". Fact is not just what you see with your own eyes; otherwise, no encyclopedia in the world would ever be trusted, and no spoken evidence given in court would ever be considered valid. I suggest you redefine your understanding of what fact is before you make crass suggestions of whether I'd be allowed in a courthouse. You might want to brush up your ideas on how courts work too while you're at it – at this point, you're much more likely to be tossed out for contempt of court than I am to be purged for providing evidence, however confronting it may be.