Talk:Amon/@comment-68.45.212.147-20120329230241/@comment-4888161-20120330015213

But there was no fourth child... It was confirmed only three kids, and out of those it could only be Bumi at this point. Even that, is so unlikely it may as well be impossible. Either way though, the same reasons why it would be rediculous for Bumi to be Amon also apply to why it would be rediculous for a hypothetical fourth child (who was confirmed to not exist btw) to be Amon. I'm sorry if I come off as rude, but this theory has been brought up so many times by many people. I've been tired of seeing it for awhile because it is rediculous. I'm not saying that to be mean, but the idea that this could happen is just that. There have been so many different takes of people trying to justify how this could happen. That would be fine, if the justifications were even remotely possible. And of course it isn't. If people saying this realized what it meant, then (as I explained in my previous comment) maybe they might understand how suilly a theory it is.

Again, I'm not saying this to be a jerk. It's just that the theory isn't realistic. Bringing it up does more harm then good, so I asked (and not for the first time) if people would stop doing that.