Talk:Asami Sato/@comment-4888161-20120527041930

Man... All this distrust and suspicion of poor Asami still lingers even after all that we saw (or in some cases refuse to see). (Disclaimer: What some people refuse to see does not mean all who have this distrust or suspicion for Asami, and I am not specifically calling anyone out.) I certainly wouldn't want to get in a trust booth with any of you people...

I also have a message for those who are wishing for this to happen because they want Makorra, or because they secretly want Makorra and refuse to admit it (you know just in case). Makorra can still happen even if Asami stays good/not an Equalist/on team Avatar/etc. There are many ways it could happen without Asami being evil/an Equalist/a traitor/etc. I even predict that Makorra will win in the end AND Asami will stay good/not an Equalist/whatever the heck you want to label it. That doesn't mean it will happen like that, but there is certainly a good chance it could happen that way. Although, I don't care which ships happen beyond being right and maybe gloating about it, and even that doesn't matter much. But anyways, there is no reason to put down Asami because of a ship like Makorra because Makorra could still easily happen anyways, if that is what any of you are doing.

To those who want this for reasons other than Makorra, what would you have to gain? Besides sticking to your theories to beyond the last moment, what is there to gain from it?

We know Asami can fight/hold her own, and not only won't be a burden to team Avatar, but will likely be a big help. We know she isn't the boring type after seeing her race and fight in episode 7, so there is no longer an excuse that she would be boring if she didn't become an Equalist because Asami already is exciting. So besides the theories, what else is there to gain by sticking to these views on Asami?

I ask because I thought about it, and I couldn't think of a legitimate reason why it would be advantages to a viewer for Asami to be an Equalist/evil/whatever. The only thing that made sense to me was that people were hanging on to the theories they made back when we knew a lot less about her. So is that the reason why? Because if people were to make theories about her today and after knowing what we know now, I can't see too many of those kinds of theories being made.