Talk:Azula/@comment-75.94.60.254-20110720064712/@comment-76.24.146.72-20110720072654

You're forgetting that the entire site was removed, the original one. While it's not impossible that that could be the case, it's not the sole thing removed from the site, everything on it was considered canon, yet the entire site was removed despite that. It's not sufficient evidence to support the retcon idea, although we can't deny the notion entirely, either.