Talk:Asami Sato/@comment-4888161-20120526040759/@comment-4888161-20120526053218

I admitted I was wrong about Hiroshi not because of episode 7, but because of the proof from 7 that proved me wrong. There was nothing to suggest he was an Equalist before 7. They just kinda threw it at us. People guessed, but I saw no signs leading towards it so I assumed he was good until 7. I mean had we known about the cause of Asami's mother's death before episode 7, I may have changed my mind before then.

'''But episode 7 also proved Asami wasn't an Equalist. It works both ways you know''' That was no less undeniable than episode 7 proving Hiroshi was one. Yet you don't see me asking you to admit there may be a chance of Hiroshi not being an Equalist. That's because they were proven either to be or not be. Why is that so hard for you to accept the Asami side of it?