Talk:Asami Sato/@comment-4888161-20120428210012/@comment-4888161-20120501013525

They can't write the bios in the first place without information about the characters. That should be common sense. So if they didn't have the information, they couldn't put it in the bio. So someone must have gotten them information that was accurate, or it wouldn't be up there. It's completely trustworthy. This site (Avatar Wiki) does not support leaks, but the Nick site is enough for them to know that it is canon and not a leak or rumor. How you can say it doesn't count when the conservative Avatar Wiki does is beyond me.

Bryke did say this earlier than that, but again I'm not going to go back and dig it up when you can't even believe this widely trusted source (that Avatar Wiki itself would rely on with no other sources involved). The Nick site is considered a legit source. Period.

You are discounting canon facts that get in the way of your theory as if they are not canon. But they are canon. I'm sorry if that offended you, but conspiracy theorists do the same sort of thing. They don't let facts and logic that disprove or lower the chances of their theory get in the way of what they want to believe. So that was where I was coming from when you kept ignoring the canon stuff. Perhaps I was a bit over the line, and I'll apologize if you like. But if you can't even believe sources trusted by everyone, it takes all the legitimacy away from your argument.

Now, I'll even apologize for something else. You are right, it is technically possible. However, it may as well not be. At the very least, there is nothing pointing towards it and plenty against it. So at the very least, it is extremely unlikely based everything we should know. So could it happen? Technically yes. But the likelihood is still so low that I would gladly bet you my house it won't happen.