Talk:Amon/@comment-67.38.230.230-20120618084126/@comment-5192864-20120619093111

'''Must kill Ozai.. Didn't kill him..''' This was NEVER a rule; Aang made his own decision. Other people told Aang to kill Ozai but it's not their decision to make; it's Aang's.

'''Can't bend metal.. Bent..''' It was just said "nobody ever bent metal before" and it is totally consistent with the fact that "Tough found a way to bend metal". I didn't see any rule changing in your case. In contrast, "only Avatar can master all four elements" or "If the Avatar in the Avatar state, the Avatar cycle will be broken" these are all positive affirmative, non-conditional propositions. If an Avatar ever died in the Avatar State (count Aang as revived) but the cycle still went on, or somebody other than the Avatar could control all four elements, then we have contradiction or like you say "rule changes"

'''Sozens comet end of the world.. good guys won''' <--- That's just an expression, not a rule, like sometimes we shout "OMG, my Mom will kill me" while we all know she won't kill us. Still, I didn't see a contradiction here. Or what, well, let's just kill ourselves because the comet comes and Ozai will won? This just sounds terribly ridiculous.

'''Die in avatar state and the avatar is gone.. Died in avatar state..''' This rule has not be challenged so far.