Talk:Amon/@comment-99.8.172.144-20120618223149/@comment-71.234.208.124-20120618232740

Your theory is flawed for obvious reasons, but given all the wild theories that are currently circulating I suppose I should not be surprised. Aang is not Amon, if he were still alive Korra would not exist. Period. And Aang is not capable of the crimes Amon has commited. And you are wrong when you say the visions Korra got showed only Aang. The very first vision showed Toph and Sokka first, actually, then Aang and a flash of Yakone. None of the visions showed Aang alone. Not. One. And it was explained what those visions meant, which I will not repeat since the episodes are easy enough to access on your own.

Sokka is not capable of the things Amon has done, either. And Amon is too light skinned, his eyes the wrong color, his voice completely different. . . Those little facts counter your theory. That, and. . . Sokka is dead.

Azula is a woman. And an insane one at that. Amon may be cruel, but he's not a raving lunatic. He's rational, charismatic - in his way. So far, from what I can see, he does not rule his followers through fear and intimidation the way Azula did, judging by the way he allowed Sato to rant and question him and the way he reacted when his followers messed up and allowed Korra to escape. He handled it all very calmly. Plus I doubt Azula could make her voice sound that deep or move as swiftly as Amon does at her age, IF she's still alive.

And finally, you are not the first to theorize that Amon is Aang, or Sokka or Azula. Or Asami, or Tarrlok, or Sato. . . Or Mako, or Bolin or Yue for all I know; there have been so many theories by people trying to guess who Amon is I can hardly keep them straight anymore. Personally I am one of those crazy radicals who believe that Amon is simply Amon. Of course, I could be wrong. I am insane, after all.

A'Len