Talk:Amon/@comment-98.200.164.35-20120610005756/@comment-98.200.164.35-20120610024539

I really hope so: that he's not Aang, I mean.

Look, I don't think this is a plausible or rational theory, and it's not one I'm defending, or putting forward. It's one I fear. I think it's the stupidest "who is Amon" theory I've ever heard. I'm just somewhat afraid it's going to prove correct, and that this will be how the Avatar series jumps the shark (or whatever hybrid shark creature they have in Avatar: lobster-shark? mantis-shark? wolverine-shark?).

I've no reason to distrust the creators' artistic integrity and storytelling ability--except that I've been disappointed with LoK from almost the beginning. It's just a lot of little things, and the pacing. Somewhat annoying. I still enjoy the show, and it's one of the better things on TV right now (though I don't watch TV much). It's just nowhere near as enthralling and as well done as TLA, in my opinion.

In short, you don't have to apologize for saying "Amon is not Aang," because I think it would be idiotic if he was. Bad, bad writing. Bad.